Writing and the modern media, by Jan Needle
Sitting at my keyboard, or terminal as we call it nowadays, I look at my
watch (or little panel at the bottom of my screen, as we et cetera et cetera)
and realise I’ve done nothing at all in two hours, maybe longer, except twiddle
and fiddle and piddle about in the name of being up with the times. I’ve looked
at Facebook, I’ve even posted something on my ‘wall,’ I’ve wondered as so often
before why it didn’t behave exactly as I expected it to, and why a link I typed in (inputted?) did not
appear as it should have done. I—
Oh! New technology strikes again. My mobile phone, lying in front of me
before the screen, has just given a couple of sickly buzzes. Why sickly? I set
it up only yesterday to be loud and brash and insistent. Apparently it’s
changed my mind for me – I deserve only a sickly buzz, and it’s just lucky it
was lying in the open and not stashed in a pocket and inaudible. The message is
interesting, and requires an answer. Unfortunately, the caller is ‘unnamed,’
for some unfathomable reason – but there is a phone number. Not one I recognise,
so now what? Click and scroll and tap and curse my way through my in-phone-phone-book
(or Contacts) at bills itself? And fail to remember it when I find the one, and
have to scroll back and lose it and start all over again? No – it was only
moderately interesting, on reflection. Sorreee…
Where was I? Oh that’s right, clicking and clacking away at the plastic
button that the paint’s worn off of, thank God I’m a touch typist. (In the old
days I had shorthand too, with my certificate for a hundred words a minute
Pitman’s charmingly made out to Miss Jan Needle, oh those dear, dead sexist
days!). Clicking and clacking away and wondering about Facebook, and why it
keeps changing, and why my ‘wall’ or ‘newsfeed’ or whatever the hell it’s called
has nothing on it now but a myriad rude notices about right-wing American
politicians, some of which are bizarrely so interesting I waste yet more wodges
of precious minutes reading them, and even replying, sometimes, to people three
thousand miles away I’ll never meet or speak to in real life but who are, wait
for it – my friends!
Earlier, it occurs to me, I did half an hour (why lie – it was nearer
fifty minutes) looking at Twitter. Did you know that Charlie Farnsbarns had a
boiled egg this morning but the dog ate his homework, or something, maybe? Did you
want to know? Did you need to know? Were the people who persuaded me that
Twitter is a vital promotional tool for an author 1, sensible, 2, bonkers, or 3,
jealous rivals who want me to spend so much time on Twitter I never have time
to write another book? Answers on an electronic postcard, please.
Dook is the one in the middle |
Why half an hour (any advance on fifty minutes?) in the first place?
Because, I’m told, that’s the minimum one should twitter in a day for people to
register you and rush out and buy your books. What books? The ones I haven’t
got round to writing yet? It’s now midday plus ten, and I switched on my
machine (a Hewlett Packard, since you ask, and I used to have a Sony Vaio, if
that’s how you spell it, it’s awful funny writing, not as good as Eric Gill
sans trousers or whatever the dirty old fellow called it but my children tell
me if I haven’t got a Mac I might as well give up and they’re unimpressed by
the fact I got ny PC for fifty quid and theirs cost oodles of (my) money. Why should
they be? I said my money. Ho bloody ho.) And now it’s twelve sixteen. Another six minutes I could have been tweeting.
12.17. Oo ’eck, I’ll never be a millionaire. 12.18.
The point is, I’m really very busy. I’m working on a manuscript which is
long, and complex, and needs total concentration, and dedication, and all that
old fashioned sort of stuff. Oh, the dog’s just barked outside near the barn. It’s
a Great Dane called Duke (locally pronounced Dook) and it’s just been bought a
friend called Pip, which is a Welsh collie (so I’m told; is there such a
thing?). We took Pip out for a walk yesterday with granddaughter Izzy and
grandson Fin (why does granddaughter get two ‘d’s but grandson only one?
Blatant sexism.) and after we’d played near the stream for a while, I suggested
letting Pip off her lead. There were no sheep around, and she’s very small, and
I couldn’t see the harm. Izzy looked at me with scorn, and forbade it. ‘Why?’
said I. ‘She’d booger off,’ said Izz. This wasn’t wasting
time, you see. This was gathering material for a children’s book.Except that
most of Izzy’s language is a bit unsuitable for a children's book, if truth be told.
It’s 12.31. I expect there’s bread and cheese downstairs somewhere. Anyway
I ought to do some tunes, or scales at least, on my mandola. Perhaps it’s not
just all these modern bits of technical fripperie that stop a writer writing. Perhaps
I’m just an idle toad.
But the truth remains, I find twiddling and twaddling so much more
attractive than it used to be in the old days. Cleaning a typewriter was so
much more boring, wasn’t it? Bring back the birch, I say!
On the other hand, clicking buttons is easy. Click on a few of these and make me rich. My children probably need a new computer. Dook eats more dog food in a day than I eat in a month. And that's the truth.
Kicking Off:
Killing Time at Catterick:
My Mate Shofiq:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0078W05XU
http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0078W05XU
Albeson and the Germans:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0078W057G
LATE NEWSFLASH late newsflash LATE NEWSFLASH late newsflash
Just read in the Guardian that Andrew Motion’s nicked my title. He's publishing a book
called Silver: Return to Treasure Island tomorrow. My
book, Return to Treasure Island – Silver and Blood, is about to go up as an ebook. Mine will only cost 99p and was started - and titled - well over four years ago. I wonder who'll get the most reviews....
Comments
Might be forced to read his story (for research you understand) but SWEAR I will also read yours if you get on and get it up-loaded. (Just ask Matti)
ps i did ask matti, and the work's been complete for some time. his cover's fabulous and it'll be up as soon as amazon extract their digit.
Hilarious post - it could be me, most mornings!
Oh as a homesick Welsh exile, could I respectfully corect you on an item in your comment above though, Llyn actually means lake - 'llun' is picture, although I agree it makes a beautiful picture!
As for sequels, nobody's mentioned Bob Leeson's Silver's Revenge, published in the 80s. Great book. Should be reissued. Bob must be sitting in his house in Broxbourne seething with rage. Then yours and his could appear together with the combined title THESE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ANDREW MOTION.
When are you going to epublish Wild Wood? Best Wind/Willows sequel of them all. Beats Horwood any day. Great piece of social history too. I still treasure Boddington.
As re the update TI... get me a copy you muppet so I can review it for the site! THEN we'll take Andrew Motion to the cleaners on reviews...
to cally: poor dook's so old now (in great dane terms) that he wouldn't survive the journey to scotland. he hardly survives a trip down stairs, his legs are so long and his co-ordination so shot. izzy and fin have a wild, rambunctious tomcat called gavin (they ARE children)as well as dook and pip, and the three of them together are wonderful. they use him as a sofa and his dewlaps as a place to hide under. three disparate creatures, comforably in love.
as to silver and blood - yes, i'll sort it out. thanks.
dogfood point. if it's addressed to jan, not dan, i can only say it's 'ard oop north, enid. sometimes, if dogfood's short, we as to eat the dog. dook is already getting nervous...
http://amzn.to/wYlt7I