Amazon is my shepherd. I shall not want. - Bill Kirton
Those nice people at Amazon emailed me recently to say there was a book they were sure would be of great interest to me. And they were right. The only problem was that I’d not only read it, I’d written it. The book in question was the fourth in the series I’d written for Pearson, Brilliant Workplace Skills, and, to try to penetrate as well as benefit from their marketing strategy, I asked myself why they decided that that was the book for me.
First, why
Workplace Skills rather than the
others? I’m well past retirement age and, in fact, I took early retirement to
concentrate on my writing, so I only share my workspace with me. Which means I
have little need for the book’s insights into topics such as promotion
prospects and how to enhance them, interpersonal relationships, office politics
and protocols. And as for the likelihood of me finding romance in the workplace... well, really! So I have to conclude that they couldn’t have
thought the content would be of interest.
Which
leaves style. Maybe they thought ‘Ah, he’s a writer. He’ll appreciate the
finely rounded phrases here, the prose rhythms and cadences, the immaculate
structuring of arguments, the inspired organisation of the material and the
impeccable choice of words’. But no, style and content can’t be separated so
arbitrarily. And anyway, all of you, the sophisticated literati who read these
blogs, will already have curled a scornful lip at the inept, heavy-handed irony of
this paragraph and dismissed it as a mere filler, a
pretence that this posting has a theme, a direction, a purpose.
So what
else? Maybe they’ve looked at my novels and decided that the fiction writer in
me needs to be mentored by his non-fiction counterpart. After all, I’m clearly
rubbish at writing crime novels. My detective makes jokes, doesn’t have a drink
or drug problem, isn’t particularly scruffy and lives with a funny, attractive
woman to whom he’s happily married. He cares about people, too, and he’s more
interested in truth than in justice, so he’s obviously not cut out to be
between the covers of a modern crime novel. And, even when I try history, the
crime bit gets overtaken or at least muddied up by romance. As for The Sparrow Conundrum, what
self-respecting auteur would admit to committing such garbage to paper (or
screen)? It's not even mid-list, for God's sake. And Alternative Dimension? Well,
it’s almost a confession that I’ve lost touch with reality.
Or maybe
there’s something else, something unthinkable really. Maybe, in their desire to
dominate the world and take the place of oxygen, the Amazon king-makers have lost the plot. They clearly have a ante-pre-post-modern-structuralist attitude to taxation, for example, and their zero hours employment practices have overtones of the original industrial revolution. And now their boss has bought The Washington Post. OK, there's no denying that their ebook revolution has, mostly, brought opportunities (and revenue) to writers who previously could only gaze through steamed-up windows at the frolics of those the gatekeepers had favoured. And yet, and yet...
Could it be that they … I hesitate to articulate it … they know very little about books? Surely they don’t think Brilliant Workplace Skills is a … a product, something electronic maybe, an executive toy, an object you put on your desk and … well, play with until it’s time to go home. No, that can’t be it. Amazon is the pinnacle of evolution, the ne plus ultra of refinement and civilisation. Amazon is the reason the Big Bang happened. No, the fault must lie in me (and, no doubt, many other writers). Amazon can’t possibly have made a mistake.
Could it be that they … I hesitate to articulate it … they know very little about books? Surely they don’t think Brilliant Workplace Skills is a … a product, something electronic maybe, an executive toy, an object you put on your desk and … well, play with until it’s time to go home. No, that can’t be it. Amazon is the pinnacle of evolution, the ne plus ultra of refinement and civilisation. Amazon is the reason the Big Bang happened. No, the fault must lie in me (and, no doubt, many other writers). Amazon can’t possibly have made a mistake.
(The
car, by the way, is a 1956 Volvo Amazon. I got the picture from Phil Seed’s
Virtual Car Museum http://www.philseed.com/volvo-121.html.)
Comments
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/08/amazon-founder-says-he-clicked-on-washington-post-by-mistake.html?utm_content=buffer4c04d&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=appdotnet&utm_campaign=Buffer
;-)
If you've looked for your book on Amazon (who wouldn't), they've tracked this and effectively put "1" next to your name and your book to show you are interested in it.
Have an experiment. Log into Amazon and search for something you have no interest in, e.g. Donkey Derby or Quantum Physics. Have a click around the related books and then close your browser and see what Amazon suggests for you next time. Maybe a madcap Donkey scientist who wants to take over the world... Bwahahahaha.
Erm ...Excuse me, I'm going for a lay down.
You see, Jan? My cunning plan worked.
Wayne, yes I know nothing's as it seems and we're putty in their hands (or at least I am) but pretending that Amazon moves in mysterious ways helps me to justify the title I chose for the post.