On Not Being Paid - Jo Carroll
My first degree is in history and politics - and I dreamed of
becoming a journalist. That would be me, I thought, rubbing shoulders with the great and the greedy in the House of Commons and sitting in a garret writing about them.
Authors Electric Jo Carroll |
Except I failed the interview. This was in the early 1970s, when there was no training for interviews, and no post mortem, so I've no idea why. I was certainly a bit shaken - there was almost full employment for graduates at the time and it was hard to turn my attention elsewhere. But events took over, as they do, and I drifted into social work and child protection - and am proud of everything I achieved so cannot suggest those years were anything other than satisfying.
But now our local online newspaper has asked me to be a columnist!
Oh what fun it is! All that adolescent enthusiasm is still there. I know, it's the council and not the MPs I'm having a pop at. And I've got a real house and not a garret. But the feelers for stories are out. No longer can I simply whinge over coffee about the infantile behaviour of our town councillors - I can write about them. No more will I grumble about the lack of opportunity for young people in the town (dominated, as it is, by perms and cardigans) - I can write about it. I know it won't change the world, but it might just tweak a corner of it.
Does it feel like turning the clock back? I suppose so, just a little. More than that, it feels like coming full circle. Because now I draw on my determination to make life better for young people, and my research skills - once used for ferreting out the truth about abuse.
And no, I'm not paid.
That's where I hear a collective intake of breath. Writing for free - surely that's against our mutual understanding about valuing our writing. We matter. Our writing matters. We should be paid for it.
Before you gang up and beat me with birch twigs, I'll tell you why I've agreed to do it.
Before you gang up and beat me with birch twigs, I'll tell you why I've agreed to do it.
Nobody working on the newspaper is paid. Not the editor, not the news reporters, not the sports reporters, not the columnists. It's a community project, undertaken for the benefit of the town. We make money from advertisers, which pays for the upkeep of the site; any that is left over goes into local projects such as the food bank and support for young families.
I'm retired. I have a pension - enough to live on. And I'm healthy. I am in a position to 'give back.' But I can't face working in a charity shop or helping with meals-on-wheels. I felt I was underpaid for my skills when I was working and am not going to give them away for free now. But this - I can do this; it is my small contribution to the town that has contained me and my family for so long.
So - in my shoes, would you have agreed to write a column, or would you stick to your writerly guns and refused to work for free?
Comments
(Of course, I don't mean to imply that anything I write is of greater social benefit than a food bank, say, or work with emigrants.)
All my admiration, Jo!
I'd do what you are doing, it's a community project and I often work for nothing in various ways for libraries, small reading groups, charities, etc, though if the events/commissions are funded, and everyone else is being paid, and tickets are being sold, then I'd expect to be paid too.
Chris, I've heard that some bookshops will 'delay' payments for a long time, no doubt to make their cash flow look better, I suggest a solicitor's letter referring to small claims court might hurry them up! Festival bookshops are often a vexed question and weird things can happen to your books...
Community work is in any case a separate issue, as it comes under charitable giving.
'Forced by circumstances to pay' may not always be the best way for a society to function. Taking a cue from philosopher Michael Sandel, I tend to agree that there are moral limits to markets. To use his terminology, is art one of those aspects of life where nonmarket norms should apply?
This is the sort of question I ask myself when I read Reb's comment about 'pay it forward'. Not everything we do has be to commodified.
And the site is Marlborough News Online: http://www.marlboroughnewsonline.co.uk/ and if you scroll down the 'columnists' you'll find my opinions on Wiltshire's 'Older People's Fun Day!'
There's really no need for a defensive reaction. I feel it's important to question and discuss underlying assumptions, my own included.
(And in case, how do you know that my knickers are clean? The most successful secret life is the one that is -- well, secret!)