Pauline Chandler asks "Who Needs Stories?"
It still amazes me that many adults don’t read fiction. I used to take it for granted that everyone did, until a chance comment from a friend, an
artist, shocked me to the core. ‘No, I don’t
read stories’, she said, ‘in fact I don't read much at all. I don't have time'. She
might as well have said ‘I don’t breathe.’
Sadly, I’ve since discovered that ‘not reading stories’ is quite common, even among teachers. Perhaps it’s all that paperwork. No time to read anything other than the latest
advice about improving their performance and meeting the agreed ‘learning
outcomes'. Pah.
Fiction
didn’t feature much on the curriculum in my own school days, during the 50s and
60s, and there was certainly no discussion about what we read in our spare time.
We were allowed to read a book, carefully censored, at playtime, as aimless running
about was frowned on. In class we read the Greek Myths, Arthur Grimble’s ‘A
Pattern of Islands’ (non-fiction) and CS Forester’s ‘The Ship’, which I can’t
now recall. Then, because I took Latin, I was not able to take English
Literature for O Level, so it was something of an eye-opener when I came to
study fiction for A Level. Suddenly, there was a world of commentary on the human condition, from such authors as CS Lewis, Iris Murdoch, George Eliot, Conrad, Lawrence,
Hemingway and the ‘moderns’, contemporary writers, Alan Sillitoe, Shelagh Delaney,Alan Paton, Arnold
Wesker, James Baldwin, all wonderful authors who spoke about relationships, love, sex, race
and gender, without prejudice. And my
cramped wings spread as I started to understand important lessons, under
the gentle persuasion of their stories.
Someone once said to me, ’You
can’t learn about life from books, you know’. Pah. You can, you know.
All
the stories we share with our children teach them the real stuff they need to live
well. About friends and kindness, respect for the earth and living things, about war and peace, famine and plenty, justice and injustice.
About families and how to make things right after a falling out, about serious
illness and disability and what life is like when you lose someone you love, about heroism and sacrifice and survival. How to judge
what’s worth aiming for, and what’s not, what will stand through time, and what
will fade away like mist.
This magic doesn’t stop when you grow up. The
stories just get better, richer, more challenging.
Do you know anyone who doesn't read stories? I wonder what would make them start. Is it too late when you're grown up?
Pauline Chandler
www.paulinechandler.com
Coming soon! A new edition of 'Warrior Girl'.
A story set in the time of Joan of Arc.
Published by Cybermouse Books.
Comments
Looking forward to reading your Joan of Arc!
My grandchildren all live in houses full of books - such fortunate children. But I feel for those who believe that words belong on a screen.
On the other hand, I suspect that it has always been much the same, and that those who read consistently and widely have always been something of a minority. If so, it's one minority I'm very happy to belong to...
I don't know if any research has been done comparing the brains/ empathy scores of fiction-readers with non-fiction readers, so Nick's theory is anecdotal. I can't see that it's an unreasonable theory, though. I remember my mother making considerable effort to teach us to 'think how it feels for others' - by biting us when we bit someone else, sometimes. She also used stories to do the same: 'How do you think the little pig felt then?' So empathy is something that's taught, or at least, enhanced by teaching.
Of course people who don't read fiction aren't without empathy or understanding. Listen to a bunch of friends in a pub, talking about some problem at work, or in a family. They speculate on 'what was in their heads,' they retell the tale, they offer different points of view.
This is the origin of fiction,after all. But I think reading a well written book is akin to mainlining the stuff instead of tasting it.
Reading also teaches many other things. There have been scholarly books written on 'The Use and Abuse of Argument,' and one of the things you learn as a reader and writer is how to manipulate with words. - Why was that word/phrase used and not that one? What was the intention, and effect?
Reading, and re-reading - and writing - makes you much more aware of this - and resistant to it.
We live in a word awash with writing - newspapers, text books, blogs, web-pages, political leaflets, adverts - as well as the scripts for tv and films, which are 'disguised writing.' (In unguarded moments people forget that the actors are repeating lines written for them, and idly think they are overhearing spontaneous speech.)
People need to be aware that words are not neutral - and because something was spoken in a news-report (more disguised editorials) or printed in a newspaper - or a novel for that matter - it's not necessarily true or reliable.
I think people who have read widely have a better chance than most of taking what is good from written words, and dodging the traps.