My role in the mystery of awareness by Bill Kirton
Five years
ago, I wrote a blog entitled Vitamin
pills, toilet rolls and philosophy. It was simply to offer light relief
amongst the specific miseries of that period and give a loose idea of the
strangeness of the world I inhabit. I’m repeating it here because of two recent events. First, there was a fascinating, informative (and very long) article in The Guardian. Then came the opening of Tom Stoppard's latest play, The Hard Problem, which examines the issue of the coexistence of 'brain' and 'mind'. Thanks to those events, I now see
that, far from being the ravings of a disturbed psyche, my absurd confessions
were part of an ongoing philosophical argument about consciousness and may qualify me for the role of a modern
Brahan Seer.
The Guardian article
examined the mystery of awareness. Its arguments were too complex for my tiny
brain to summarise here but it seems that philosophers, neuroscientists, poets,
religious people and all sorts of others have been trying to get to grips with
the idea of consciousness for centuries. The specific thread that brings my old
blog into the equation is something called
panpsychism, which is ‘the dizzying notion that everything in the
universe might be conscious’. The brilliance of my anticipation of this
development can be judged from my musings in 2010, which went as follows:
I don’t
know if it’s a writer-type thing but in many ways I inhabit a strange world.
Let me give you a couple of examples:
Most
mornings I take a multi-vitamin pill. I know the scientists have proved that
they make no difference but I’ve been doing it for years and, since it doesn’t
seem to have harmed me, why stop?
Anyway, the pills are in the normal sort of container, which I tip and shake in order to ‘dispense’ one into my hand. But sometimes, two or three come out, occasionally with such force that they bounce off my palm to roll across the work surface. And so my mind starts speculating about them. Is it an escape bid? If so, what do they intend to escape for and to? How many career choices does a vitamin pill have? Alternatively, it might be a suicide mission, clamouring for my attention, each pill wanting to be the one I choose to send down into the acids that await it. So deciding which ones to put back into the container becomes a question of ethics.
And the speculation continues. What’s life like for them inside their container? They just lie there, cuddled up against one another in the dark, for around 24 hours, at which point they start realising that one of them will soon be taking its last journey. Is the boredom of such an existence so great that they try to shuffle to the top of the heap to give themselves a chance of being that lucky one? Or is being part of that tight, localised community reassuring to such an extent that they burrow down to make sure they stay a little longer with all their pill pals? Do they, in the other 23+ hours, discuss their condition, share their angst?
And when it comes down to there being just two left, then one … well, the scenario is appalling. Those last two obviously didn’t want to go, they’ve avoided the drop into my palm but it’s now become inevitable. And I feel sorry for them.
Anyway, the pills are in the normal sort of container, which I tip and shake in order to ‘dispense’ one into my hand. But sometimes, two or three come out, occasionally with such force that they bounce off my palm to roll across the work surface. And so my mind starts speculating about them. Is it an escape bid? If so, what do they intend to escape for and to? How many career choices does a vitamin pill have? Alternatively, it might be a suicide mission, clamouring for my attention, each pill wanting to be the one I choose to send down into the acids that await it. So deciding which ones to put back into the container becomes a question of ethics.
And the speculation continues. What’s life like for them inside their container? They just lie there, cuddled up against one another in the dark, for around 24 hours, at which point they start realising that one of them will soon be taking its last journey. Is the boredom of such an existence so great that they try to shuffle to the top of the heap to give themselves a chance of being that lucky one? Or is being part of that tight, localised community reassuring to such an extent that they burrow down to make sure they stay a little longer with all their pill pals? Do they, in the other 23+ hours, discuss their condition, share their angst?
And when it comes down to there being just two left, then one … well, the scenario is appalling. Those last two obviously didn’t want to go, they’ve avoided the drop into my palm but it’s now become inevitable. And I feel sorry for them.
For the
second example, I won’t go into the same amount of detail for reasons which
will be obvious. It involves toilet rolls. No, I don’t mean is it better to be
one of the sheets at the outside end of the roll in order to get it over with
quickly. After all, the manufacturers have dictated the fate of the individual
sheets and, if you’re on the outside, that’s it. It’s rather like our Great
British aristocratic hierarchy. – some of us are just cheap, thin tissues on
the roll of life, others double-padded, dimpled, luxury creations. We’re all
headed for the same … er … end, but have wildly different experiences before we
get there.
So my concern isn’t with individual sheets, but with the rolls themselves. You see, my toilet roll holder is a sort of stainless steel pole which sits on its base on the floor and holds three rolls, one on top of the other. I have the power to grant ... well, immortality to the roll at the bottom, while those stacked above it, especially the top one, exist for mere weeks. The ethical dilemma this time is whether, in fairness to each roll, when the top one is finished with, I should just put a new one back on top of the other two or move them up and put the new roll on the bottom. (Notice my admirable restraint here as I avoid exploiting the juxtaposition of the words ‘toilet paper’ and ‘bottom’ to make ribald jokes.)
So my concern isn’t with individual sheets, but with the rolls themselves. You see, my toilet roll holder is a sort of stainless steel pole which sits on its base on the floor and holds three rolls, one on top of the other. I have the power to grant ... well, immortality to the roll at the bottom, while those stacked above it, especially the top one, exist for mere weeks. The ethical dilemma this time is whether, in fairness to each roll, when the top one is finished with, I should just put a new one back on top of the other two or move them up and put the new roll on the bottom. (Notice my admirable restraint here as I avoid exploiting the juxtaposition of the words ‘toilet paper’ and ‘bottom’ to make ribald jokes.)
And that,
friends, is the nature of the strange
world I mentioned. I find myself giving inanimate objects feelings, desires,
ambitions. I feel sorry for them, admire their fortitude, courage and stoicism,
I empathise with things such as staples and glue.
Which is,
of course, stupid. But it’s stupid in a specific way because I’m imposing my
values on them. Just because I lead a meaningless existence, it doesn’t mean
that they do. Vitamin pills, toilet rolls and all the other things are brought
into the world with a single, specific, dedicated purpose. And they fulfil
their destiny. The pill delivers its goodies into my system and vanishes, just
as it was ordained it should. In other words, all these things are much better
off than I am. They have the security of a function. Their essence and existence coincide.
In fact,
now I come to think of it, they should be feeling sorry for me.
Comments
;-)
Fun post!
Great post, Bill - I saw a comedian on 'Would I Lie To You' who said he felt sorry for the bowls in his kitchen cabinet, and often rearranged them so the ones on the bottom would be used as often as the ones on the top. He thought the ones on the bottom must feel bored and neglected.
The other team confidently said he was lying - obviously he was making it up. Who would do that? He swore that he was telling the truth.
I doubted - but now the scales are lifted from my eyes and I see that, in fact, he felt the pain of those bowls.
Thank God there’ll be someone to share my asylum cell, Mari. I frequently suggest out loud to my computer that it’s being unreasonable, and my thanks to my car after a particularly long journey is always effusive.
Jan, thanks for your kindness and understanding.
Catherine, your comments reminded me that, for some, all these 'inanimate' things carry souls. My PhD thesis was on Victor Hugo and his (sort of) Manichean beliefs involved souls transmigrating up and down through various levels of torment, so even the 'flint pebble' that Susan wants to be is a dreadful prison for a voiceless soul.
Brilliant piece of work, Bill.
That Guardian article is very interesting. Asks the big questions and offers some fascinating answers.
Thanks Reb.
I've been a fan of Byron since my teens and some of his rhyming is inspired, as in Don Juan:
But O ye lords of ladies intellectual,
Inform us truly, have they not henpecked you all?
Lydia, I think this anthropomorphism that goes on between you and automobiles is surely worth a blog of its own. Please. I mean, that poor, nameless, male convertible, beautiful but unloved, conscious of the fact and seeing a procession of cherished replacements, each anointed with a name that wouldn’t be out of place in The Great Gatsby. As for that vixen Primrose… well!
It was always so for me, and probably still is. Cutlery has soul.