This week marks the second anniversary of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. You remember: neo-Nazis, torches, one fatality and a US President claiming “You also had some very fine people on both sides.”
Bullshit.
But that's not what this post is about. It's about labels, how we use them and, perhaps, how they use us. This is what I wrote on my own blog Shanghai Noir in the days following this horror show.
last week
I ran into an article by Lan Samantha Chang entitled Writers, Protect Your Inner Life. Sam’s day job is director of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop. When school’s out, she gives writing workshops in Paris (2014) and Napa (2016).
At Napa, Sam gave a craft lecture on the interior life. She gave us a
handout called “Ways to Nurture Your Inner Life”. 3 of the 14 tips
involved getting off social media. I thought her article would cover the
same territory but I had missed the subtitle .
A Writing Life and a Writing Career Are Two Separate Things.
these past few months
Ever since the publication of The Dancing Girl and the Turtle,
I’ve been obsessed with social media. My own, of course. I’m looking
for a cool photo to post on Instagram. Trying to grab hold of the
merry-go-round called Twitter. Even this blog had become part of my
social media image.
This is not an experience unique to writers. As Sam so aptly notes, there is
considerable pressure in this [US] society to have a strong and well-defined outer
life. In New York, that might include real estate and private schools.
In Iowa, this might include regular family dinners made from personally
gathered, wild edibles. This pressure began way back with our country’s
founders, many of whom believed in the existence of the elect – in the
idea that some of us are predestined to salvation. This idea can be
logically extended to mean that some of us are not. Because we have no
way, when we’re alive, of knowing which of us is predestined, it is
important to behave as if.
For a writer, this pressure to groom our outer lives is sales-driven.
Our publishers, agents and peers tell us that we must talk about our
writing. We must expose ourselves. There is no other way to attract and
retain readers. Yet most writers struggle to do so. It’s like grasping
mercury with your bare hands: painful and ultimately impossible. Again,
Sam says it best:
the sincere reaction to
making meaningful art is often speechlessness. We make art about what we
cannot understand through any other method.
right now
Writing should be my priority, not winning the Miss Congeniality
award. All the blood should be going into my novel-in-progress. But just
as the creative process is near impossible to dissect, you can’t control
its ebb and flow either.
Thinking, fast and slow
was once a business school mantra. It’s also a great metaphor for the
act of writing. A novel contains a million moving parts, all of which
connect in ways known only to the author. But my mind can only hold so
much information. So I’m in a tearing rush to get it all on paper before
the words leak out my ears.
At the same time, I need to slow down. Let life seep into my novel
because it’s life that informs and deepens writing. By life, I don’t
mean autobiographical arcana. I want my novel to burst with living,
breathing human beings in all their wonder, beauty and horror. I’m
referring now to Charlottesville.
last night
Like most people, I’ve read numerous of eyewitness accounts of the
nightmare now known as #Charlottesville. Some called it a reversal of
the civil rights movement. Others saw the rise of the Third Reich. In
both cases, it’s unabashed violence against the helpless, merely because
they can be labelled as “other”.
Danica Bornstein
has written a powerful and painful exploration of her own reactions to
Charlottesville. She’s fully cognizant of the privileges her white skin
accords her. Yet, as a Jew, she is also deeply afraid. Nazis surround a
synagogue and the congregation hides the Torah for safekeeping. We’re
not talking about Nuremburg 1937 but Charlottesville 2017. Bornstein
reminds us that we’re not so removed from the Holocaust as we’d like to
think.
Every oppression is special
and unique and one of anti-Semitism’s key qualities is its rhythm. It
is not relentless; it is cyclical. During the good times everyone but us
starts to forget anti-Semitism and starts to think of it as a thing of
the past. […] But then something goes wrong in that place – the economy
crashes, unemployment rises, the wheels begin to fall off – and the
active phase of anti-Semitism begins.
When I was in my 20’s, I went to New York City with some girlfriends.
In those days, it was possible to jam a taxi full of giggling girls. I
was smooshed up against the cab driver, who proceeded to tell me his
life’s story.
While a student at the music conservatory in Vienna, he lost his
hearing. He needed surgery and the US was the only place he could get
it. And so he went, thus becoming the only member of his family to
survive the Holocaust. He remarried and raised a family. He was terribly
proud of his daughter the lawyer and his son the doctor.
At the end of the ride, this fellow offered me a piece of hard white
candy. Of course, my mother had taught me never to take candy from
strangers. But I knew that if I refused this gift, I would break this
gentle soul’s heart. Besides, I was with friends who could rush me to
the hospital. And so I took the candy, popped it into my mouth and lived
to tell the tale.
today
I don’t think I’d do the same today. Life feels so much more dangerous. There
are assholes and creeps everywhere it seems. Not to speak of the crazies
who come with semi-automatic weapons to Charlottesville. It’s getting
hard to know who to trust.
Our prehistoric forefathers had it easier. They could tell, just by
looking or smelling, whether safety or danger lay ahead. We’ve inherited
that same instinct for survival but have somehow lost our ability to
read the signs. We mistake skin color for intent, religion for
acceptability, clothing as a political statement. We like to
over-generalize, categorize, and label.
But our labels are all wrong. Should I fear every white man with a
shaved head and tattoos? Can I safely associate only with those people
who look and act and sound like me? When I cross the street at night, am
I being foolish, racist or both?
in retrospect
A month ago, I wrote an article for booksbywomen.org called We Are Not Labels.
I fulminated there about the various labels affixed to my forehead:
female, Asian, immigrant. But my conclusion was that, for a writer,
labels are a necessary evil. They’re how readers find you. I wrote:
Labels are shortcuts. They
function as signposts or runes for the initiated to discern the truth.
That’s all. No need to get our knickers in a twist.
I was wrong. Labels aren’t shortcuts; they’re pitfalls. They don’t
all wash off. Some of them can get you killed. As long as we navigate
through life using only labels, we don’t have to think. And in our
thoughtlessness, Charlottesville is doomed to recur.
Danica Bornstein reminds us that skin color cannot be the only
measure of friend or foe. That beneath whatever shade of dermis you
might have, lies a wealth of complexity.
Sam Chang teaches me not to worry about the outer life. Look instead
to the place inside that gives birth to your creativity. It’s the same
place that makes me, me and you, you.
Fascinating and edifying, Karen. Thank you. You've managed a broad sweep of very troubling, complex issues over a long period and kept the essentials clear and focused. I wish our 'leaders' could find and act on such clarity.
Veni, vidi...Wiki! Not long ago I had the all-time greatest Great Idea: one, born of total ignorance, that nearly tanked a novel. As you may have guessed from my opening line, my subject is Julius Caesar. But you might not have guessed from the title that my Great Idea entailed his being reborn as a penis. Don't laugh, please, I beg you. I saw no way around this, even though showing JC as a 'dick' might lead some to think that I've written a spoof. In fact, it's a serious thriller. Without giving the plot away, I can say this: I needed JC's ghost, today, remembering his nights with Cleopatra on her fabled golden barge. There was the heart of my book--a ghost trying for 2000 years to relive that lost boogie with Liz. And I'd begun to run with this when my memory corrected me: Mark Anthony, not JC, was on the barge with Cleo. And this was after JC's death. What the hell was I to do, lacking the good sense to check memory's 'facts
Barbara Hughes in the Sportswoman's Library (BL permission) The title of my book has been changed: That Spirit of Independence has become Stars to Steer By . It’s still a book of celebration, mentioning more than one hundred wonderful sea-women. And yes, they are all included because of their variously independent spirits. No change there. The title I chose myself was given me by a rebellious Solent racer called Barbara Hughes. She was racing slim, fast keelboats from the age of about 13 in 1885 and loved it: ‘It is the most delightful education in the world, the most interesting and healthful. It becomes so engrossing that you will not rest until you understand the whole thing and know the why and wherefore of all the different moves.’ Barbara was the 5th of 6 children so was usually subordinate to her father, brothers or older sisters. She wanted to be in charge of her own boat, competing on equal terms: ‘you should have it all in your own hands, with no one to say you “nay”, o
A young Ellison, at his Olympia SG 3 Alas, we seem to be losing all the great ones lately. Well, this is a common illusion when some beloved figure dies. Last week it was Harlan Ellison, who died June 28, just a week ago in his sleep at 84, after suffering a stroke in 2014. Ellison was probably the least known famous writer in the world. To me and a lot of writers who were his fans, he epitomized everything the brilliant, provocative, flamboyant, prolific, wild-eyed writer ought to be - and usually fall short of. Whatever one thinks of his prodigious body of work, one could not fail to admire his ferocity as a creative spirit and human being. "Born without an off-switch," his friends said. He went, Energizer-Bunny-like, fully until he stopped. Jewish by birth, atheist by self-proclamation, Ellison lived consistently by the three great moral questions of Rabbi Hillel the Elder : "If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? "If I am for myself alone, t
Imagine you’re a you ng journalist from The Times , reporting on the Hay literary festival. Nice job if you love books and writing – which journalists do, or they’d be doing something else – and you should enjoy it while you can, as literary festivals are sadly in their Götterdämmerung p eriod, what with no corporate sponsor being pure enough to be allowed to fund them, and grants from such lofty organisations as the Arts Council being extremely unlikely, owing to books being lamentably highbrow and middle class (not!). Anthony Horowitz By Edwardx - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=126308848 So there you are, listening to Anthony Horowitz speak on a panel on the subject of rewriting classics by dead authors in order to remove ‘offensive’ language ( as Puffin did last year with a new edition of Roald Dahl’s works ), and you hear him say he doesn’t approve of burglarising books. Yup, that’s what he said. Well, he must have said that, there’
Image Credit: Images created in Book Brush using Pixabay photos Opening lines must hook a reader so they read the rest of your story or article. I aim to write something which intrigues me, draft the rest, and as I do that, ideas occur to strength that first line. So I go back and do so. The act of writing something down in and of itself seems to trigger creativity to come up with more and better ideas. It’s a pity you can’t bottle that effect and bring it out when you need it! As I write a lot of flash fiction, where my maximum word count is 1000 words, the opening line carries even more weight. I see it as doing a lot of heavy lifting. Sometimes I will write circle stories where the closing line is a repetition of the opening one or is similar to it with, say, one minor change. That change has come about due to what happened in the story itself. I find, whatever I write, as long as I have something down to start me off, away I go happily. It can be finding the way into a piece whic
Comments