Gorgeous George and the Devil Himself
Brawls are fun to enjoy from the bleachers. And the first great literary feud still has a lot to teach us. Meet the two combatants now.
In the left corner, Lord Byron (aka George Gordon): Born in 1788. 5'8". Lover, boxer, swimmer, marksman and literary rock star. Drank wine from a human skull and had sex with his half-sister.
In the right corner, Robert Southey: Born in 1774. A 6' former rebel who turned coat for a government pension. Became Poet Laureate when Walter Scott declined. Sang prolifically then for his supper.
Fight genesis: Motives seem murky. Southey may have seen in Byron the sins he wished he'd been blessed to commit, while Byron saw in Southey the staid bore he feared he'd become. But three factors combined to stir up the big brawl:
--1818. Byron took quick playful shots at Southey in the Dedication of Don Juan. Though Lord B's English Bards & Scotch Reviewers had lambasted everyone nine years before, his new dig at Southey turned obscene:
--1818. Byron took quick playful shots at Southey in the Dedication of Don Juan. Though Lord B's English Bards & Scotch Reviewers had lambasted everyone nine years before, his new dig at Southey turned obscene:
You, Bob, are rather insolent, you know,
At being disappointed in your wish
To supersede all warblers here below,
And be the only Blackbird in the dish;
And then you overstrain yourself, or so,
And tumble downward like the flying fish
Gasping on deck,because you soar too high, Bob,
And fall, for lack of moisture quite a-dry, Bob!
(Note: a dry bob refers to sex without ejaculation.)
--1820. Southey swung back in his Vision of Judgement, attacking the 'Satanic school' of poetry--to which, he suggested, his rival belonged.
--1822. Byron believed that Southey had spread rumors of a 'League of Incest' involving him and Shelley. And so he delivered the next, mortal blow: a brilliant parody of Southey's VOJ (which had portrayed George III's ascent to heaven). Byron's version ridiculed both the 'mad, old, blind, despised and dying king' and his poet mercilessly. And Southey became the new national joke while two years later Byron died a hero's death in Greece.
A few points to consider for those contemplating feuds:
1) A change in moral climate may make you rue your words. Young writers came to envy the Byronic lifestyle. And the 'Satanic school' seemed a cool school to attend. Better to burn with Lord Byron than be an insufferable bore.
1) A change in moral climate may make you rue your words. Young writers came to envy the Byronic lifestyle. And the 'Satanic school' seemed a cool school to attend. Better to burn with Lord Byron than be an insufferable bore.
2) An ironic twist of fate can do still more to ruin you. If the sinner you've had the misfortune to slime dies young and heroically, your past attacks will have dug your own grave. Today there are statues of Byron in and around Missolonghi while no one remembers Bob Southey, who lost his health and then his mind.
3) The wittier writer may trump Manly Men. Norman Mailer once slugged Gore Vidal because of a snotty review. But GV was ready the next time--as luck would have it, on TV. When Mailer headbutted him, GV replied: 'Once again, words fail Norman Mailer.' End of conversation.
4) The best defense against cruel wit can be the unvarnished truth. Vidal had lampooned Tru Capote and Tennessee Williams for years. (Sample? One of many: 'Truman's a full-fledged housewife from Kansas with all the prejudices.') Tru's response: 'He's jealous. Gore has literally never written a masterpiece. He has not written an unforgettable book or a book that was the turning point in either his or anybody else's life. Without that, it doesn't matter how much he does or what he does.' Nor was Tru afraid of Mailer, who'd sat on him and called In Cold blood 'A failure of the imagination.' Tru responded, when the time was right: 'Now I see that the only prizes Norman wins are for that kind of writing. I'm glad I was of some small service to him.'
3) The wittier writer may trump Manly Men. Norman Mailer once slugged Gore Vidal because of a snotty review. But GV was ready the next time--as luck would have it, on TV. When Mailer headbutted him, GV replied: 'Once again, words fail Norman Mailer.' End of conversation.
4) The best defense against cruel wit can be the unvarnished truth. Vidal had lampooned Tru Capote and Tennessee Williams for years. (Sample? One of many: 'Truman's a full-fledged housewife from Kansas with all the prejudices.') Tru's response: 'He's jealous. Gore has literally never written a masterpiece. He has not written an unforgettable book or a book that was the turning point in either his or anybody else's life. Without that, it doesn't matter how much he does or what he does.' Nor was Tru afraid of Mailer, who'd sat on him and called In Cold blood 'A failure of the imagination.' Tru responded, when the time was right: 'Now I see that the only prizes Norman wins are for that kind of writing. I'm glad I was of some small service to him.'
5) But even the wittiest may do themselves in. Capote was shunned when word got around that his work in progress, Answered Prayers, would tar-and-feather his rich, famous friends. And Oscar Wilde went to jail for his jovial quips in the courtroom -- not because he preferred sex with boys.
Conclusion and Proposal
Byron was lucky to have died before TV and Facebook, TMZ and Twitter. The fur now flies at frightening speed. And the quickest clicks of keys cause feuds that last for years. Hold your fire when you can. And return to your desk to do battle again with the Devil Himself that's within you.
All the rest is smoke and noise.
Conclusion and Proposal
Byron was lucky to have died before TV and Facebook, TMZ and Twitter. The fur now flies at frightening speed. And the quickest clicks of keys cause feuds that last for years. Hold your fire when you can. And return to your desk to do battle again with the Devil Himself that's within you.
All the rest is smoke and noise.
Comments
Why am I so sensitive about them? Because I'm convinced that:
1. they're simply lazy shortcuts
2. they give self-publishing a bad reputation
Reb's writing about literary spats and handbaggings - which have been a feature of literary life for hundreds of years - and have now moved to Twitter and FB. It's not about anyone in particular.
I won't even answer Lee except to say: If you have nothing better to do, I pity you. Here's what I'm doing these days--besides working, writing my seventh ebook, maintaining a popular blog, honoring the memory of a fallen colleague (dead from acute alcoholism) and still making time for my family and friends: I'm following my plan to read and review at least one book by every member of AE. I'm reading Bill Kirton's latest--loving it. Next up: Catherine and Val. How 'bout you: done anything to help anyone at all?
To the members of AE, a simple request: if you agree that my posts 'give self-publishing a bad reputation', that they're riddled with the one-trick pony's favorite word (cliche! touche!)...of if you feel my posts draw too much heat...let me know. And out of respect and love for the group, I'll withdraw.
Lee, if your words pass for wit in your neck of the woods, drool first next time around so we all know you're joking.
How'd I do, Reb?
And Nick, it's a bit of a cliche for you to be so short and feisty. But I salute your bounce and verve. Please keep visiting AE.
Still, you've got me thinking now about all the fussin' and feudin'. I'm ashamed to admit this but--God help me--I came this close to posting that I'd like to bite Lee's ankles.
Thanks to you I won't, though. Have a warm, loving, cliche-free evening, my friends!
Reb, I've certainly never suggested - nor even thought - that you should withdraw from AE. But anyone who can write 'I was born to write' without wincing should be more self-critical.
This has very little to do with the amount of work you have.
There's a place for cliché in good writing, but it has to be done with care. David Mitchell, for example, uses clichés very effectively in Black Swan Green to explore Jason's early development as a writer.
I've said it before, and I'll keep saying it no matter how many defenders you have: clichés are lazy writing.
Which doesn't address the issue of whether I really exist. For that, you'll have to read Corvus.
;-)
Anonymous: Byron was accorded a hero's death though he die of a fever--because he did go to Greece to assist the fight for freedom. Knock Lord Byron all you like on moral grounds, he gave his life and his money to a country that he loved. The full account is in Leslie Marchand's classic biography of Byron. But this sums it up concisely. From Wikipedia: 'He travelled to fight against the Ottoman Empire in the Greek War of Independence, for which Greeks revere him as a national hero.[1] He died at age 36 from a fever contracted while in Missolonghi in Greece.'
Byron had already left England in 1816 for relief from the charges of incest. He spent most of his last eight years in Italy, productive and in love. He didn't need to go to Greece in 1823 because of the old charges. He went to help the Greeks.
I totally agree with Reb when he says you should be fighting and competing with only yourself. When you start comparing yourself to others is when you start trying to fit into the cookie-cutter version of the perfect writer. It doesn't exist. A writer's voice is the most precious gift, and trying to change it to fit someone else's definition of great writing would prove to be devastating.
So, to the people who love to cut others down because it makes them feel superior, I just have to say your time would be better spent giving constructive criticism rather than cruel and unnecessary comments. Maybe if you spent more time helping people than cutting them down, you might be a little happier.