Is NaNoWriMo really a good idea? (And are the AIs really out to get me?) by Rosalie Warren
In 2015 I did NaNoWriMo, the writing challenge that
encourages you to complete a 50,000 word first draft within the month of
November. I needed a bit of motivation for my new science fiction
novel, and I believed that the 1700 words (approximately) required per day
would not be beyond me, since I often write (or used to write – see below)
around 1500-2000 words a day anyway. NaNo seemed like a good way of making sure
I kept to that, while enabling me to finish my first draft just in time to
start my Christmas shopping.
It proved to be a lot harder than
I’d expected. What I’d forgotten was that, although I often wrote as much as
2000 words a day, I generally allowed myself at least one day off a week –
sometimes two. I’d even give myself an extra day or so if I was travelling,
babysitting, or feeling under the weather. NaNo permits no such luxuries. Or
rather, it does, but you have to catch up on any time lost and the whole thing
soon gets away from you. It was a tough month and I sometimes found myself
getting up extra early to write or catching up on it before I went to bed.
Fine, you say. A bit of discipline never did anyone any harm. Think of all
those authors with full-time jobs and/or caring commitments – the only way they
can write is to get up at 5 a.m. (May I just stop to convey my deepest admiration
and respect for all writers who do this. You are true stars and deserve to win
the Man Booker, every one of you.)
Somehow, I managed to complete my 50,000 words before
December burst upon us, and I enjoyed a brief surge of achievement before the
Christmas shopping kicked in. I realised, of course, that what I had was just a
draft, and a very drafty (and draughty, as in full of holes) one at that. But
that’s usual for me – my first drafts always need lots of work, even to the
point of reading them through and then binning and rewriting them from scratch.
(Not being able to read my own handwriting is one of the reasons for this, and
I do like to write my first drafts with a black inky pen on lovely smooth paper
– don’t get me started…) Anyway, the draft was filed away on my (literal)
desktop, where it sits to this day, giving me accusing glances as I gaze vacantly at the
weather forecast on my screen, devour the Archers website and Authors Electric, and
scurry along behind my friends on Facebook.
Normally, I’d have managed to bring myself to look at it by
February or March. I’d have done the requisite cringing that always accompanies
a read of my own work (like hearing your voice on tape or seeing yourself on
video, ugh). Then I’d have knuckled down and started the rewrite. I might have
attempted a synopsis/plan before starting again. Settled on the names of my
characters, at least to make them consistent. Checked a few scientific facts
online to make sure I hadn’t made stupid mistakes. I’d have soon been writing
again, for better or worse, and by now, a year later, I’d have had a second,
third or even fourth draft safely stashed in nine different places on my
laptop, on our other computer and somewhere in that mysterious ‘cloud’. Oh yes,
and a print copy, just in case my story came true and the AIs (artifical intelligences) ate up all our electronic
data in their quest for domination of the universe. (If you can’t suspend your
own disbelief, whose can you? Is that good English? Probably not…)
I’ve just had a thought. Maybe the AIs have been sabotaging
my story from the start? Now that might make for a much better plot… I’ll
follow it up later, when I’ve finished blaming NaNo for my failure to produce a
book.
No, I’m not really going to blame NaNo. It wouldn’t be fair,
though I suspect that 1700 words a day does not suit me as a writer. I think it’s
just too much. I ended up so far ahead of my imagination that I was writing
drivel – even more than usual, you might want to say. I was writing for the
sake of writing and I’m not sure it’s a good idea. Sometimes, yes, like forcing
yourself to go for a walk or a swim and then finding you enjoy it after all –
but not every day. Writing isn’t the same as walking, anyway. Our creative
brains need time to refill themselves. Perhaps everyone has an optimum word
rate and the key is to find it, at least when circumstances allow (and to be
prepared to adjust it as we change and grow).
A number of other things have happened this year to put me
off writing, including a period of poor health. The thing is, though, I never gave up
completely… or not for long. I’m now into another book, which seems to be going
quite well (though at a much slower rate than I’m used to, and certainly not
1700 words a day). It’s that NaNo novel in particular that I don’t seem able to
face. I can’t even look at it. I somehow dust it once a week without moving the
tissue box that lies on top. As for actually opening the folder… no. NO NO
NO!!!
The Scary Pile (Note: this photo wins the prize for the least interesting picture posted on Authors Electric in 2016. By a LONG way...) |
I was all set to write this post when, the other morning, I
woke up with a little glimmer of something in my head. Maybe I’d had a dream.
Or perhaps my brain had done some filing, some sorting, some reasoning, and now
found itself able to contemplate that NaNo book again. Not to open the folder.
That would be a crazy step too far. But to think, a tiny bit, about the story
and the characters, and to admit that it could actually be quite interesting.
Maybe the AIs have decided I’m no longer a threat and removed
the firewall from my head. Or maybe it’s simply the passage of time. Whatever
has happened, I’ve at least convinced myself that NaNo doesn’t work for me,
though I’m sure it’s fine for some of the writers, some of the time. Watch out,
though - my second work of scifi may be rolling off the press at some point in
the next two (or twenty) years.
My first scifi novel (2015). It was the people, not the AIs, who were bad in this one. The AIs were fine. That's probably why they let me write it. |
Follow me on Twitter @Ros_Warren
Best wishes,
Ros
Comments