Lion & Shambala Junction: Dipika Mukherjee investigates international adoptions
When I started
writing Shambala Junction in Amsterdam in 2009, I had no idea
that there was a traumatised young man named Saroo Brierley. Oceans away from
me in Australia, he was desperately searching satellite images on Google Earth,
trying to find a way from Howrah railway station to the home he lost as a child
in India.
I had angrily
started to write my novel, tentatively titled Finding Piya, after
reading a short news article in an Indian community newspaper about babies for
sale in India. The article described a flourishing trade in unscrupulous
international adoptions operating out of India.
Shambala Junction was published in
2016, after winning the Virginia Prize for Fiction in the UK. Also in 2016, the
much-feted movie Lion opened in movie theaters worldwide starring
scene-stealer Sunny Pawar, as well as Dev Patel and Nicole Kidman. Lion is
based on Brierley’s memoir (A Long Way Home, 2013).
Although Saroo
Brierley was not an orphan, he had been adopted into a
home in Canberra. The adult Brierley’s flashbacks would take him on a long
journey to find his family in India and Lion puts a human face
on a real problem in international adoptions; children who are not orphans can
be torn from their roots and birth families and given up for international
adoptions.
In a market where
rich foreigners pay in thousands of dollars to adopt and children are sold for
mere hundreds, there is the potential for corruption, and this is where Shambala
Junction starts its story.
Shambala Junction begins with an
Indian-American woman, Iris Sen, getting lost in a railway station after she
steps off a train to buy a bottle of water. She is rescued by Aman and gets
embroiled in the search for Aman’s baby, Piya, who is being offered to Western
homes although her family desperately wants the baby back.
Finding Piya was the original
title for this novel, which is at heart a thrilling chase to find the missing
Piya. I changed the title because the book became so much more than just a
chase, and the Buddhist connotations in Shambala are important in this book, as
well as in India, where the sacred coexists with the profane on many planes.
Shambala Junction is about a
person wanting to do good, about stumbling our way through a gray world, making
terrible mistakes, but ultimately doing the right thing even when it comes at a
high personal cost.
I hope the
characters in this book – especially the women—will shatter some stereotypes
about submissive Asian femininity (as the real activist Gulabi Gang is
doing). I want to open dialogues on social issues through this book and I am
delighted to see that the initial reviews on Goodreads and Amazon show readers engaging with these
serious issues despite the distractions of a high-stakes chase!
Unfortunately
celebrity adoptions – like those by Madonna or Brangelina – gloss over the
realities and do little to address the real-world problems underlying
international adoptions. As recently as on Feb 6, 2017, the BBC covered Madonna posting instagram pictures of her adopted Malawi
twins and writing "I am deeply grateful to all those in
Malawi who helped make this possible," before appealing for privacy from
the media during "this transitional time."
What doesn’t appear
in this happy picture is the other child she adopted in 2006, David, who was
not an orphan as his father (and grandmother) were alive; also, as the Guardian reported, adoptions to foreigners was illegal in
Malawi and Madonna had to fight a legal battle for his custody.
An NPR article on David's adoption questions Madonna’s intentions by linking the issue to
slavery.
Corruption in
international adoptions IS a human rights issue, but there is no outcry
because the children are frequently taken from impoverished homes into a more
affluent life -- as shown in Lion -- and for many, that alone
justifies the means. This is a highly contentious issue with some adoption
agencies pushing agendas like Kidnapping for Jesus.
But surely there are
many ways to improve the future of impoverished children without
transplanting them out of familiar places where they surrounded by
loved ones, especially as most are taken at an age when they are unable to
articulate a preference? The cost of doing
good should not be based on a geography of entitlement, where adopted children
prosper in new western homes, leaving their natal homes fractured in the
process.
Comments