Gender Imbalance in the Publishing World - Bronwen Griffiths
International Women’s Day has just passed and I want
to explore how books by women authors are perceived. Is there a bias in reviews
towards men and against women? How do women fare in mainstream literary awards? Are women fairly represented?
The feminist arts organisation, Vida (based in the
USA) has been examining the gender imbalance of both critics and authors whose books
are reviewed, since 2010. They surveyed fifteen major literary publications and
found that eight failed to reach gender parity in 2017. These publications
included the London Review
of Books at 26.9%, the New Yorker
at 39.7%, the Times Literary Supplement at 35.9% and the New York Review of
Books at only 23.3% - down from 46.9% the previous year.
Just two of the major publications surveyed
published 50% or more female writers – Granta and Poetry – while five published
between 40% and 49.9% women, including Harper’s, the New York Times Book Review
and the Paris Review.
The dominance of white male literary critics ‘creates
a dangerous lens through which the world is viewed’, VIDA states. The situation
of gender imbalance in reviews and publications is even worse for Black and
Ethnic Minority women, and for women published in translation.
Vida did, however, find that smaller literary
magazines such as the New England Review and the Virginia Quarterly Review were
‘far more equitable’ than larger publications, with fifteen out of twenty-four publishing
as many or more female writers as men.
The major literature awards also show a disparity –
with the exception of the Costa Book of the Year.
Major award winners in the last 10 years
|
||
Award
|
Male
winners
|
Female
winners
|
Booker
Prize
|
7
|
3
|
Costa Book
of the Year
|
5
|
5
|
Nobel
Prize For Literature
|
7
|
3
|
Pulitzer
Prize for Fiction (NB no prize given in 2009)
|
6
|
3
|
In 2015, Almost 20 years
after Francine Prose investigated whether ‘women writers are really inferior’
in her explosive essay Scent of a
Woman’s Ink, the author Catherine
Nichols found that submitting her manuscript under a male pseudonym brought her
more than eight times the number of responses she had received under her own
name. Of course this is not a scientific survey but it would be interesting to
repeat it.
Nichols reveals how after she sent out her novel to fifty
agents, she received just two manuscript requests. But when she set up a new
email address under a male name, and submitted the same covering letter and
pages to fifty agents, it was requested seventeen times.
As for male authors recommending other authors, using The New York Times' "By the
Book" column, which asks authors about the specific books on their
nightstands, UC Berkeley Assistant Professor David Bamman's analysis shows that male
authors recommend books by other men four times as often as they recommend books by women.
However, it's
not just about the gender of the author, but also the gender of the characters
- in 2015, author
Nicola Griffith found twelve of the previous fifteen Booker
Prize-winning novels had male protagonists.
But is the problem of published books
in certain genres also partly due to women themselves? We perhaps expect our
romances to be written (and read) by women. As Julie Crisp, Commissioning
Editor for Tor books has written, there is a definite gender gap in science
fiction and fantasy:
‘In the last few years I have
seen numerous articles deploring the lack of female SFF (Science Fiction and
Fantasy) writers, in science fiction in particular. And usually, the blame
always comes back to the publisher's doorstep. Every time I've seen one of
these articles I get a little hot under the collar because, guess what? I work
in publishing. I work in genre. And here's the kicker - I'm a woman. Yes, a
female editor commissioning and actively looking for good genre - male AND
female. That means that every genre publisher in the UK has female
commissioning editors and 90% of the genre imprints here are actually run by
women. So you can imagine there's a slight sense of frustration each time I see
yet another article claiming that UK publishers are biased towards male
writers. And I do wonder if those writing the pieces are aware who is actually
commissioning these authors? The sad fact is, we can't publish what we're not
submitted. Tor UK has an open submission
policy- as a matter of curiosity we went
through it recently to see what the ratio of male to female writers was and what
areas they were writing in…The facts are, out of 503 submissions - only 32% have been from female writers…(and)
when it comes to science fiction only
22% of the submissions we received were from female writers.’
To sum up, things are improving
for women authors, though still less so for BAME women authors and for female authors
who do not write in English. But it seems like we have a way to go yet – though
women can be their own worst enemies by submitting
less, or being more apologetic about their work. I certainly fall into the
latter category.
As for men writing romance –
well I think that’s like men wanting to work in the childcare and other caring
professions –men have some walls to climb too.
Comments