What's Poisonous and Everywhere? - A Review by Susan Price
Pure, White and Deadly, by John Yudkin |
They have little connection with Authors Electric's usual subject of independent publishing, but as I've spent years watching this poison damage the health of my family, I feel strongly on the subject and want as many people as possible to hear of these books. So I post here, to a larger audience, rather than on my own Nennius blog.
I know I shall probably be accused of being a kill-joy, but I think people should have the information in these books - to ignore if they choose. But an uninformed or misled choice, is no choice at all.
I was haunted in the supermarket recently. In almost
every aisle, a voice whispered in my ear, “Pure. White. And deadly.”
I’d been re-reading Dr. John Yudkin’s classic book of that name. It's about a
slow poison, with which it's perfectly legal to adulterate our food. It's probably
in the next thing you put in your mouth, and it's responsible for a mountain of
pain, sickness and death.
I first read Pure,
White and Deadly in the ‘80s. It’s probably why, at 57, I am healthy and
only slightly overweight rather than obese and diabetic, as my parents were by
their 40s. The book caused me to change my ways: to exercise more and alter the
way I eat.
But this invaluable work's been out of print for decades.
Why? – Dr. Yudkin’s chapter on how Pure, White and Deadly's pushers campaigned
against him provides a clue. They finance scientific conferences – but only if speakers
say nothing critical of their product. More than once they threatened withdrawal of their support from a conference unless Yudkin
was dropped from the programme or submitted to censorship,
The pushers told conference organisers that Dr.
Yudkin (a respected Professor of Nutrition at Birmingham University, UK) was
‘not qualified’, ‘not even a professor’ but ‘only a teacher’ who held bizarre
and unproven beliefs about their product.
All untrue, as his book shows. But the Pushers know mud sticks.
Fat Chance by Robert Lustig |
Both books are aimed at the lay-reader – because
both doctors desperately want to inform us. Both books are easily read, and
supply an uncomfortable answer to the question: Why is obesity
increasing, world-wide, at such a rate?
Why are more people reaching weights of 20, 30, 40
stone? Why are diabetes, heart disease and cancer increasingly found in younger
people, even children, with such frequency our economies are threatened?
Why have these things increased so sharply in the
last thirty years? Is it simply that we eat more and do less? If so, why is exactly the
same thing happening in countries where life isn't sedentary?
Lustig is furious at the complacency which says that
if the obese ‘showed some will power’ they would be slim.
Lustig once believed this himself, before he began
treating obese children. Now he's convinced that ‘a calorie is not a calorie.’ That's what the Food Industry would like you to believe. Then they can put all the blame on us.
Our bodies are not passive containers, with calories
poured in as fuel, and poured out as exercise. If they were, only the number of calories we consume and burn off would matter, regardless of what those calories were made of.
But our bodies are active, living things, controlled by a complex relay of chemical reactions which evolved millions of years ago and haven't changed. The chemical content of our food dictates how the body's chemistry will deal with it - and how our body will then make us behave.
Our bodies haven't changed since the Stone Age. Our environment and the food we eat have changed enormously.
But our bodies are active, living things, controlled by a complex relay of chemical reactions which evolved millions of years ago and haven't changed. The chemical content of our food dictates how the body's chemistry will deal with it - and how our body will then make us behave.
Our bodies haven't changed since the Stone Age. Our environment and the food we eat have changed enormously.
The body is not a machine that we control, like a
car we drive, whatever we think. The body has its own agenda and the control-panel
is often not within our reach.
The Pushers' refrain is that people ‘have choice’
about what they put in their mouths, and therefore, if they choose to eat in a
way that makes them obese, that's 'their choice'. People should have 'freedom' to eat as they like. And 'freedom' is sacrosanct, isn't it? When huge, multi-national corporations become concerned with your freedom, beware.
Lustig asks what choice did a grossly obese six-month
old have? What choice do people in poor neighbourhoods have, when every
supermarket selling fresh food has shunned them, and the only food easily and
cheaply available is the preserved and packaged stuff in the corner store? What
choice do we have when we aren't told what the food we eat contains?
Remember the misinformation spread about Yudkin. How
'free' is a choice based on misinformation?
What true choice do any of us have when Pure White
and Deadly's pushers cram it into everything, to extend shelf-life and make
their products more palatable and addictive? When they use so many different
names to disguise it in ingredients’ lists? When they spend millions on
advertising, using beautiful, slim actors, to convince people that their
products are ‘natural’, ‘healthy’, ‘energising’, even ‘cool.’ (Think of a
certain fizzy drink.)
As a result the child felt constantly ravenous,
regardless of how much she ate. She became obese, and also utterly listless, disinclined
to move and without interest in anything.
Was this ‘her choice’? Her unregulated hormones made
her sensation of hunger never-ending. Her sedentary listlessness was due – not
to psychological depression or laziness – but to her brain’s physiological
determination to save energy because it perceived her as starving.
Her constant eating raised her blood-insulin level,
thus ensuring that everything she ate was stored as fat – while her hormones
continued to scream, 'Starving!' at her brain. None of this was remotely within
control of her will-power.
Lustig treated the child with the hormone leptin, in
which she was deficient. Almost instantly, her constant food-craving stopped –
what a huge relief - and she lost weight. She became more interested in life generally,
and did more, helping her mother about the house. Her mother was ecstatic.
Probably not because of the dusting.
What has this to do with the rest of us, with our
functioning hypothalami?
Remember, the body is not a passive receptacle for
any old calorie. Lustig explains how our hormones act in complicated chain
dances. We may label them, say, ‘sex hormones,’ but they are seldom responsible
for one action alone. Rather, they act in concert with different bio-chemicals,
in different degrees at different times, to produce a whole range of results.
The over- or under- production of one hormone destabilises other body systems,
resulting in ill health.
You may have a functioning hypothalamus. Your body
may produce leptin. But what if some imbalance prevents your body from
recognising it? Or blocks its action?
Leptin ‘turns off’ hunger, but can be blocked by
insulin. If it is, you will crave food and over-eat. (One reason why a
carbohydrate-rich diet can trigger over-eating.)
Perhaps you won’t crave to the extent that Lustig’s patient did, but the craving will, nonetheless, be beyond your will-power - which is why, Lustig says, 'will-power' always, ultimately, fails. It is no match for the body's hormonal insistence that it is hungry.
Perhaps you won’t crave to the extent that Lustig’s patient did, but the craving will, nonetheless, be beyond your will-power - which is why, Lustig says, 'will-power' always, ultimately, fails. It is no match for the body's hormonal insistence that it is hungry.
It’s well known that the body becomes increasingly
resistant to drugs, requiring higher doses to produce the same effect. The body
also becomes resistant to its own productions, such as insulin.
Everyone knows that insulin regulates the level of
blood glucose, lowering it when it's too high. What’s less well known is that
insulin works by converting the glucose to fat. It isn’t floating in your blood
anymore – it’s neatly tidied away into your fat cells
Refined carbohydrate and fructose is quickly digested,
triggering high blood-glucose and high insulin release. The more insulin is in
your blood, the more likely it is that leptin release will be blocked – causing
you to continue feeling hungry.
Meanwhile insulin is busily tidying up. It's much
quicker to lower glucose levels by storing it as fat than to burn it for
energy. It often tucks the fat away around the major organs. This is visceral
fat: the most metabolically active and dangerous kind.
Not all foods raise blood glucose levels quickly
enough to send insulin into a tidy-up frenzy. Protein - eggs, fish, meat, nuts -
doesn't trouble blood-glucose or insulin at all. Foods full of fibre - whole
fruit and vegetables - release their glucose so slowly over such a long period
that they don't cause any problem either. Even whole grains cause little
problem.
It's no coincidence that these are the foods the
human race evolved to eat back in the Stone Age. The body knows how to deal with them.
So all calories are not equal. It matters what
foods your calories come from.
A calorie plus low insulin equals energy.
A calorie plus high insulin equals fat storage.
When the body becomes resistant to its own insulin,
it’s possible to have both high blood sugar and high levels of insulin. Neither
is good news. High insulin levels are a marker for obesity. And Diabetes II.
So, what are the foods that cause soaring
blood-glucose and insulin, and the disruption of hormone-pathways?
The answer's simple: the foods we didn't evolve to
eat. The food and drink that has that poisonous additive, Pure, White and Deadly.
Refined
sucrose; aka fructose, or high fructose corn syrup. More and more of the stuff
has been added to our food, world-wide, in the past 30 years: corresponding
exactly to the ‘obesity pandemic.’
This is what Yudkin said in the '80s, when the Pure White and Deadly pushers tried so hard to discredit him.
This is what Yudkin said in the '80s, when the Pure White and Deadly pushers tried so hard to discredit him.
Lustig and a colleague undertook some research on
figures for sugar-fructose consumption per capita, world-wide – allowing for
age and income and even for the fact that not every kilo bought was necessarily
consumed. They looked at figures not only for the West, but for countries which have only very recently begun to eat our sugar-heavy diet. When compared with figures for obesity, they expected to find a
correlation. Instead, the figures matched so closely that they amounted, Lustig
says, to ‘causation’.
As with Big Tobacco, it’s hard to find
something good to say about Big Sugar. It was started by people who
felt entitled to kidnap other human beings, and force them to spend their lives
working to enrich their captors.
The slaves were freed, but today the industry - and
the Food Industry generally - manufactures a damaging, addictive, unhealthy
product, while trying to silence criticism and using every trick of advertising
and deceptive labeling to dodge the truth about what they sell, and keep us
buying more. Like Big Tobacco, Big Sugar tries to hook ‘em young, with cute characters fronting cereals that are 50% sugar. (And, as Lustig points out, Big Tobacco and Big Sugar are often the same companies.)
I suppose you can say these industries are consistent.
They would love you to believe their product is
‘natural’. It’s made from stuff that grows in fields, so it's got to be natural, right?
Most European sugar is produced from beet, and that
isn't especially tempting in its natural state. Yudkin’s account of what the
sugar industry does to its raw material is another jaw-dropping read. I'd
forgotten just how processed this ‘natural’ food is. First it’s mashed and
pulped to remove all fibre, keeping only the juice. Already concentrated and
calorific, the juice is processed still further, and bleached, until the pure
white crystals contain no trace of any nutrient whatsoever.
I’ll repeat that. No nutrient whatsoever. No minerals, no vitamins, no protein, no
fat. You might as well eat cardboard - except, of course, that cardboard isn't
addictively sweet and stimulating to the brain's reward centre.
Pure White and Deadly contains nothing except
concentrated carbohydrate in its most empty, refined and quickly absorbed form. It dehydrates and
irritates the tissues and is implicated in Crohn's and IBS. It punches
blood-glucose high, triggering over-production of insulin – and what does
insulin do, besides lowering blood-glucose? – It stores the excess as fat.
Constant repetition of this cycle plays Old Nick
with the body’s hormonal system.
Poison
Poison
Definitions of 'poison' from the OED: 'Substance
that when introduced to a living organism destroys life or injures health (emphasis mine)…substance interfering with normal progression of
chain reaction, catalytic reaction…'
Sugar is not a food. It is an unfood. An anti-food. A
poison. And it’s addictive. It’s an addictive, poisonous, anti-food.
You cannot win with the stuff. Say that an adult
woman needs 2,500 calories a day to survive and maintain her weight. Some of
those calories need to be protein, some fat, and some unrefined carbohydrate,
from vegetables and fruit or wholegrains. These should supply everything her
body needs.
If she eats Pure White and Deadly as well, she
must either replace some of the food above, to maintain the level of 2,500
calories; or eat the PW&D in addition to it.
If the PW&D is in addition to her healthy diet,
then she not only plays havoc with her hormonal system, but eats more than she
needs. Her weight gain will be exacerbated by insulin's tidying up.
If she maintains her calorie level by replacing some
of her food with sugar, then she will not only play havoc with her hormonal
system, but will be malnourished – which doesn’t necessarily mean thin. It does
mean functioning at below full health. Her body, in struggling to deal with a
substance it didn't evolve for, will promote storage of visceral fat, even if
she doesn’t appear overweight. (She will be secretly fat: there's paranoia for you.)
It’s not guaranteed that she will become diabetic. As
with cigarettes and lung-cancer, much depends on individual genetics and luck.
But diabetes is certainly in the cards, especially if it's already in your
family. If we’re going to take this gamble, shouldn’t we be made, all of us,
fully aware of the risk?
Tobacco has its shocking warnings on every packet. Shouldn’t every can of fizzy drink,
every packet of biscuits, cakes, ready
meals – and all the other foods loaded with PW&D – carry a large picture and
history of an obese person? Take just one member of my family, for instance, a morbidly obese diabetic.
She went blind. One foot was amputated because damaged blood-vessels turned it gangrenous.
She suffered years of congestive heart-failure, had a stroke, and lingered for a month or so before finally dying. All these ills were complications of diabetes.
Us chubby men and women in the street are told that the
obesity epidemic is our fault because we 'choose' to ‘eat too much and do too
little.’ While parroting this slogan, the Food Industry does all it can to
persuade us to buy food and drink crammed with sugar and fructose. It’s hard to
avoid, even when you’re fully aware and check labels obsessively.
Feed your children healthily, and they're made to
feel deprived. Why can't they have chocolate and biscuits in their lunch-box, with a can of sweet, fizzy drink to wash it down?
Look, that advert says that sweet sticky 'fruit-bar' is healthy, and those
chocolates are 'light'. And they don't like porridge, they don't want porridge. Why can't they have the chocolate cereal advertised by the cute funny animals, which is crammed full of sugar to hide the natural bitterness of chocolate?
Like tobacco, Pure White and Deadly is a substance
that is only legal because it was first marketed hundreds of years ago. Like
tobacco, it would never be passed for legal consumption today, in the light of modern
medical knowledge.
The Pure White and Deadly industry’s constant claim
is that we know what we’re doing when we buy food containing their poison; that
we make a free choice. And they care so very much about our freedom.
Okay – let’s make their claim true. Please,
everyone, read these books. Inform yourselves – and then make informed, truly free
choices about what you buy and eat.
Here’s Lustig’s conclusion: Sugar is addictive and toxic.
And Yudkin's: Sugar is Pure. White. And Deadly.
Find Yudkin's Pure White and Deadly as a Kindle book here. (It's also available as a paperback.)
Find Lustig's Fat Chance on Kindle here. (Also in paperback.)
The links to these books are supplied by ViewBook One link is supposed to take you to the correct Amazon store for your location, whether it's the UK, the US, Canada or wherever. I'd be interested to know how well they work!
Susan Price won the Carnegie Medal for her book, The Ghost Drum.
She won the Guardian Fiction Prize for The Sterkarm Handshake.
Details of all her books can be found here.
Susan Price won the Carnegie Medal for her book, The Ghost Drum.
She won the Guardian Fiction Prize for The Sterkarm Handshake.
Details of all her books can be found here.
Comments
Lustig wants us to be able to see, easily, that the product contains, say, 7% natural sugars, and 48% added Pure, White and Deadly. He also wants to prevent manufacturers hiding the stuff behind such names as dextrose, invert maltose - yes, and honey, because it all has the same effect on our bodies.
Neanderthals rule! The Stone Age diet is the best way (give or take a little cannibalism - but hey, your steaks from your great uncle are protein, so they won't raise your insulin levels.)