If only life were like Art by Bill Kirton
For this blog to make sense I need first of
all to set out my religious beliefs. But don’t worry, I don't have any. I care
about people but I have no time for the artificial systems they’ve created to
promote the self-interest of a particular caste or segment of society. I'm not
knocking any specific religion but hierarchies which peddle the idea of delayed
gratification to the people they’ve subjugated make me angry. When people are
suffering in this life, why make it even worse by promising that the next one
will be better? I don’t expect many of the people reading this will share what
seems a bleak perception and they probably won’t even have read this far. But,
however it appears, it's not my intention to alienate them or get into
religious debate. I recognize their right to their own opinions, and that their
beliefs are as valid as my absence of belief. This is just the background for
the main point I want to make.
For me life is absurd – hugely enjoyable
but absurd. It has no purpose, point, direction. This ‘now’ in which I'm tapping
these words out on these keys, has no link with the ‘now’ when you're reading
them. Like the elements of every other ‘now’, they’re contingent,
self-contained. There are those who find such a position impossible; they need
to feel that they’re following a path and that there’s a destination. They assume
that life without meaning is unbearable, empty. On the contrary, for me it’s
liberating. It means I see just how precious it is, how lucky I am to have
benefited from the accident of birth and how I intend to make the most of it. A
melody or a sunset or a kiss doesn’t have to have meaning to make it
pleasurable.
But activities such as games, sports or the
arts do have meaning. They follow their own rules, have conclusions,
resolutions – they have the good, old-fashioned beginnings, middles and
endings. Each match, symphony, play, novel sets out its themes, its contrasts,
then plays them out against or with one another. And, of them all, it’s the written
word which brings it all closest to ‘reality’. (This isn’t comparing and
contrasting the different art forms – it’s just that words are so definite and
relate specifically to our everyday world in a way that musical notes or brush
strokes don’t.) And, thanks to that, they give us the illusion of structure,
meaning.
Depending on your own position on all this,
it may seem self-evident (or crap). I’m only bothering to say it all because,
in the course of writing five novels about a particular detective (Don’t worry,
this isn’t a promo), I’ve become aware of things that may have been there
subconsciously all along but which have become more evident as I start thinking
about the sixth. You see, I now know that this one will be the last in the
series – not because I’m tired of the characters, but because it seems to me
that there’s an obvious consistency and progression through the sequence which
will lead to an inevitable conclusion. I’m not making any great claims to have
created a modern Comédie Humaine but we all, to a greater or lesser degree, do
use our fictions to impose structure on the void. In this particular case, the cumulative
effect of the main character’s experiences will lead to him making a choice
that’s logical but simultaneously incompatible with his function. Basically,
he’s had enough and can’t reconcile himself to the hypocrisy and falsity of the
public morality which the law (and he, as its representative), is supposed to
uphold.
The beauty (or curse) of not believing in
anything, of course, is that these present words may bite me on the bum when
the sequence doesn’t turn out as I’m anticipating it will. That’s the nature of
absurdity. My main point, though, is that when we’re creating our fictions
we’re taking a time-out from arbitrariness and contingency and, in a corny way,
cheating them. We’re making a wee universe in which rules are obeyed, sins are
punished (or not) and the final full stop comes where (God-like) we choose to
put it, not at some arbitrary point as we’re crossing the road or eating a
pretzel or lying oblivious to the probings of the surgeon’s scalpel. Taken to
its logical conclusion, this implies that our best reality is the fictions we
enjoy as readers and writers. What a pity that life doesn’t imitate art.
Comments
And Chris, what do you mean 'a bit of'?
And, while it's never occurred to me to think I was a disciple of my main character, I recognise the truth of what you say about his possible nocturnal visit.
I think, in life as in art, we put the meaning in there. We make the meaning. I quote from 'A beautiful mind' 'Life - activities available, just add meaning'
(Chris, Bill is an existential philosopher - I on the other hand am a fully paid up moral philosopher of more analytical tradition) Thus he says life is absurd and I say, life is absurd but we make it mean something (if we choose) For most people they want the meaning given to them, for some of us we're happy to create our own meaning. Is that life reflecting art?
And, despite the nature of this posting and my replies, I'm flattered (and terrified) to be given the label 'philosopher'. Yes, I find the existentialists come closest to 'explaining' things in a way that makes sense to me but if I had to stand up and debate these things with you, you'd make mincemeat of me, as would most people with any sort of faith. My own lack of faith isn't nihilistic, I love life and I'm having a great time.
You contrive your meaning from several thousand years of history - social, moral, political, spiritual etc. To think that you do it on your own is in itself absurd.
Cally, see what I mean about mincemeat? In contexts such as this I use words too loosely. In fact, despite tagging the 'most people' bit on, I wasn't associating you with any faith, certainly not anything religious.