104,000 DOWNLOADS; 104 REVIEWS; WOMEN’S LITERARY FICTION? by John A. A. Logan
Author,
Linda Gillard, has written on occasion about the constraints of genre on
fiction, or, more particularly, the problems “genre-busting” books can present
to publishers, and their marketing departments.
I’ve
mentioned previously that my literary agent sent The Survival of Thomas Ford
out to publishers, sometimes as literary fiction, and sometimes as a commercial
thriller, and sometimes as a “literary thriller”.
In
June, I wrote here about the Bookbub promotion I did in April, to Bookbub’s
Mystery, Thriller, Suspense subscription list (which is now no longer available
and has been split into two lists). This had a successful post-promo effect of
about 50 new Amazon USA reviews, and 1000 sales at the $2.99 post-promo price.
As
a further experiment in “genre”, I submitted The Survival of Thomas Ford to
Bookbub’s literary fiction list at the end of August.
On
this occasion, I also used EBOOKBOOSTER, which Mark Chisnell had mentioned
using in an earlier blog here. EREADER NEWS TODAY and INDIE BOOK BARGAINS sent Thomas Ford out to their subscription lists as well.
The
post-promo experiment result seems to have been that the “literary fiction”
list were just as happy to download and review Thomas Ford as the
“mystery/thriller/suspense” list had been in April. A “genre-busting” result?
When
the book went back to its regular $2.99/£1.95 price, I noticed that The
Survival of Thomas Ford went to number 27 in the Kindle Literary Fiction chart
on Amazon UK.
David
Mitchell’s CLOUD ATLAS was just above at 25; THE GREAT GATSBY just below at 29.
Ford
also appeared at number 30 on the bestselling chart for all literary fiction on
Amazon UK, paperbacks included (even though it only exists as an ebook).
Of
unique interest this time, though, was the appearance of The Survival of Thomas
Ford in a new (to me) Top 100 category, when it came in at number 30 in Women’s
Literary Fiction.
For
a few moments, I panicked.
How
was I going to sort this out? I’m not a woman.
I
thought Amazon had somehow accidentally put me on a Top 100 list of female
authors of literary fiction.
Genre-busting
had perhaps gone too far and morphed into gender-busting?
How
do you even contact Amazon to explain such a problem? Where do you start?
I
think I even clenched a fist, staring at the screen.
Not
that I wasn’t honoured to be in such fine literary company.
I
scoured the Top 100 Women’s Literary Fiction list.
Margaret
Atwood, Alice Munro, Louisa May Alcott…
Then
I saw D. H. Lawrence…Ernest Hemingway (!)…
It
was Ok. Not a list of women writers of literary fiction that Thomas Ford had
found its way onto wrongly, but a list of literary fiction of particular
interest to women…
(“Aye,
there’s the rub” as Hamlet would say…)
I
was starting to remember now…there had been some online controversy a few
months ago when this list was created.
Women
authors had been writing online that there was no need for such a list, that
“literary fiction should be literary fiction”, with no gender preference
necessary.
They
considered the creation of such a separate list a step backwards.
I
couldn’t help liking the idea, though, that somehow The Survival of Thomas Ford
was now on a spectrum where it sold happily as a crime thriller at one end,
while simultaneously entering the Women’s Literary Fiction Top 100 at the other
end, sitting between D. H. Lawrence and Ernest Hemingway, but just along from
Muriel Spark and Virginia Woolf.
Around
this time, The Survival of Thomas Ford had its 104000th download.
In
the same week, its 104th review turned up on Amazon US:
5.0
out of 5 stars Dark, riveting suspense, September 6, 2013
By
Peggy
Strickland “Momose” (Georgia, USA)
Amazon Verified Purchase
This review is from: The Survival of Thomas
Ford (Kindle Edition)
The
Survival of Thomas Ford is never a foregone conclusion. From the very
beginning, one never knows if he will survive, and if he does... Will he want
to?
The characters in this book are tragically flawed, none quite heroic. We fight along with one or more, to survive, not knowing if we really like them. Others, we know from the start are not worthy of our caring, yet they still beg for our empathy or maybe just compassion. The writing is heavy in Scottish dialect; one can almost hear the distinctive burr. To this perhaps provincial reader from the American Deep South, that aspect added a unique quality to the characterization and required concentrated attention to detail. Overall, I found the story engrossing, a good read. |
#############################################################
I’d
also like to mention here that my other ebook, Storm Damage, won Best Short
Story Collection last month, in the eFestival of Words Best of the Independent
eBooks Awards 2013.
Thanks
very much to everyone who voted.
This
is even more of an area where genre/form is supposed to dictate sales/success
levels.
13
years ago, my first literary agent impressed upon me that short story
collections were impossible to sell.
Three
years ago, my second literary agent confirmed this.
14
months ago, I blogged here on Author’s Electric about the revived potential of
the short story collection in the epublishing age:
Comments
Amazon Publishing recently contacted me to ask about my next book. I wasn't sure I wanted to give up independence, but I was interested to know what they might offer as bait. They asked for a synopsis and 4 chapters of my wip which is another of my genre-busters - a family drama with romantic & paranormal elements.
Amazon got back to me with a No. The novel wouldn't fit either their Romance imprint or their Historical Fiction imprint, which is where they were hoping to place me.
I was relieved I wouldn't have to make the big decision, but I was very disappointed to learn that Amazon who have been such great innovators elsewhere, have decided to publish in such an old-fashioned way.
I'm now wondering if what I write is "Women's Literary Fiction". ;-)
(Only Blackadder fans know what I'm on about.)
Another wonderful blog. Your statistics are astounding. You must have been very flattered that the reviewer picked up your "Scottish voice."
Best wishes
Margaret