Thoughts on the Vlogging of Zoella - Andrew Crofts
This was the month of Zoella the Vlogger,
(that’s “video-blogger”, for those who haven’t been following the story.) For
reasons too complicated to be bothered with, I was aware of this book’s approach
before the full page article in the Sunday
Times explained that it was the fastest selling new release from a debut
author since the beginning of time. The article was a sort of expose, telling
shocked readers that Miss Sugg, (Zoella’s wonderfully Dickensian real name),
had had the help of a ghostwriter to pen her debut novel, “Girl Online.” A
languidly affronted Will Self was quoted as saying that he did not regard
Zoella as a writer “in the sense that I’d regard Marcel Proust or Franz Kafka
as one.”
The following morning my in-box was
filled with requests from eminent journalists asking if I had any thoughts on
the whole shocking scandal. Always eager for a bit of free publicity I stared
hard, (it has also of course been a triumphant month for that greatest of all
starers, Paddington Bear,) into the depths of my soul to see what I truly
thought about the whole broo-haha.
Why, I wondered, was everyone being
so po-faced about the whole thing?
A likeable young woman had been blogging
and vlogging about stuff most young girls are interested in. Digital
word-of-mouth had led to millions of followers, which whetted the appetites of
agents and publishers. They suggested she wrote a novel – why wouldn’t she?
It’s a fun thing to do!
Writing a book takes a bit of
practice, so obviously she would need some help if it was to be done quickly,
which she freely admits to. A professional writer was then paid a rather mean
fee by the publisher considering the company’s managing director has been
quoted as saying that he knew immediately that the book was going to be a
“Christmas number one.” As a member of the Society of Authors Management
Committee I am well aware most writers are grateful for any crumbs thrown their
way, but I don’t think that the fee this writer was allegedly paid, (£8,000),
supports the general argument that publishers like to put forward about being
authors’ best friends and supporters, unlike that naughty bunch of ruthless
business people over at Amazon.
I’m sure, however, that the
ghostwriter enjoyed herself; the publisher got a jolly romantic novel for
teenagers, which did indeed go to number one, and the teenagers were
hysterically happy when their heroine signed their copies. The book was so
successful, however, that the denizens of Fleet Street felt stirred to shoot it
out of the sky with the revelation that a ghost had done the whole thing,
(something which Zoella herself had never denied but which the publisher became
extremely mealy-mouthed about when asked to comment).
A little bit of fluffy glitz had
illuminated the usually sombre world of publishing for a few days. Why would
Will Self even have an opinion? (The same reason as me, I suppose). Why did so
many highly educated, well-read and literate people want to rain on this poor
girl’s parade? This has got nothing to do with Kafka or Proust. This is a
little Christmas treat for young people who like reading about celebrities as
much as they like reading about vampires, boy wizards and romantic goings-on
and ponies. Maybe if the publishing industry lightened up a bit more often it
wouldn’t find it so hard to get people to buy books! That, I think, is what I
think.
Comments