Illogical Positivism: N M Browne
A J Ayer ( I think) made the point that
there is nothing you can say that would disprove the existence of God to a
person who believes in him: belief is unverifiable. (It’s a long time since I
read his Language Truth and Logic but bear
with me on this.) Along the same lines there is nothing you can say to a
writer that will make us satisfied: satisfaction is unattainable. Yeah, I know
these two statements are only stylistically related, but in both cases there
are no objective facts that can change the opinion of the believer or the
writer. I’ll explain.
If
you write a book and you can’t sell either directly or to an agent/publisher then you are sad
and believe you have no talent. Even your mother and best friend saying how
much they love it is unlikely to change your mind. If you sell the book to the
agent/publisher, but not to the top selling retail outlets you are still be sad
and believe you have no talent. You tell yourself that your work is too classy
to be commercial, but you don’t really believe it. If you sell the book to the agent/publisher,
the top selling retail outlets and very few readers buy it then – yes, you can
see where I’m going here – you are sad and believe you have no talent. You can
blame the promotion, the cover design, the unfortunate release date and the declining
attention spans of the populace who can’t take in anything longer than 140 characters
but methinks you doth protest too much. Even writers who sell books by the shed-load to readers the world over are sad and believe they have no talent because
they fail to gain literary prizes. Then the ones whose books have achieved
everything, like the famous, castle-inhabiting writer of a mega selling children's series, think it’s all probably a bit of a fluke and
try to write something else under an assumed name so that those books will fail
to sell and then they can be sad and believe they have no talent. We are as a body a tragic, if self selecting,
group.
Occasionally you meet arrogant
writers who believe the opposite, but as a rule of thumb (in my humble opinion
etc) pretty well everyone who does this is either American (and constitutionally
obliged to be excessively confident,) a certain type of privileged male, and/or quasi illiterate. They are rarely right. Most
writers who are any good, recognise all the ways they could be better and those
who think they are brilliant, don’t really grasp what it is to be good. There
will be exceptions and if you are an American, a certain type of man or quasi illiterate (and
managing somehow to make it through this contorted prose) don’t have a go at
me, I am already sad and know I have no talent.
I am impressed by illogical positivism (You go girl! Yay!) but don't try to cheer me up. Once you have accepted the logic of negativity, it frees up a
lot of time for writing.
Comments
Then there's a wee gap in the narrative and the next section begins 'I've lost my stick'.