Avoiding the scaffolds: N M Browne
Image from BBC News Plymouth web page |
So, I have an apology to make: the last time I blogged I
lied.
I thought that once my submission
draft of the book-of-strange-directions was finished I’d have lots of useful
tips to share on becoming a best seller, breaking the internet and tweeting up
a twitter storm. As you, dear reader, have yet to hear from me, you may safely
assume that none of the above has actually happened. Maybe next month.
In lieu of sharing the secrets of my yet-to-be-achieved
success, I can confess that I am clearing the decks for an academic
project. I won’t bore you with the
details of that except to point out that the prospect of academic writing has
made me realise how much I adore making things up all day. So, as I tidy my desk and try to refigure my
brain, I am drawn inevitably to pretty well anything that isn't study. Obviously it would be
stupid to start something new when I’ve a lot of clever intellectual stuff to
be doing, but refining something old, slightly rejigging the odd character,
surely there’s time for that?
As all writers know, that way madness lies. If I haven’t time to write something new, I definitely
don’t have time for something old.
Something old and
unpublished inevitably needs the literary equivalent of a wrecking ball.
I am a fan of ‘Grand
Designs’, the TV show, which documents, in humiliating detail, the tribulations
of would-be homeowners overseeing their own building project. If you’ve ever watched it, you will know that
rebuilding and preserving an existing building takes twice as long and costs
three times as much as starting from scratch. We long time viewers, observe
with shameful schadenfreude as the
bright eyed, optimistic enthusiasts of the opening sequence, with their plans
and their budgets and their intact marriages, are reduced to gibbering near-ruin. They camp in leaking caravans in the rain when some technological key
stone gets stuck in Germany for months, foundations sink and the bespoke glass
imported from one small factory in Iceland is three centimetres too small. Let
me tell you: rewriting is worse than that.
At least in rebuilding you are unlikely to end up with a one
bedroom bungalow when you hoped for a four bedroom semi. Not so with rewriting: if you are suitably
critical of your own prose it is not un likely that a hefty 600,000 word trilogy could be
radically repurposed into a 2,000 word
short.
I have a couple of books that need that kind of overhaul: a
nice little third person chick lit romance in need of a much funnier first
person voice, a ghost and maybe a new love interest and don’t get me started on my
menopausal demon novel, which is funny in all the wrong places and plotwise
several sandwiches short of a picnic.
However, because I am an experienced writer and an avid
viewer of 'Grand Designs' I am not going to mess with either of them. I’m going
to step away from my keyboard, pick up my new student’s back pack and walk very
deliberately to the library. Honest.
Comments
And along with the previous commentators, I want a copy of the menopausal demon, even though mine was quite some time ago (any thoughts on a sequel called "The Post-Menopausal Demon"?