A love affair with Literary Fiction? - Louise Boland
One commentator asked ‘Why should we subsidise writers who have lost the plot?’ and quoted Eimear McBride’s A Girl is a Half-formed Thing as an example of writing that had ‘lost the plot’.
The Prince of Mirrors - Alan Robert Clark |
At the end of the last year, just before Christmas, the Arts
Council released a report confirming something everybody already knew but had
been too scared to say.
Finally, the elephant in the room was pointed out and
someone took a sharp intake of breath at the sight of the emperor’s new clothes. Yes, I am talking about the Arts Council’s
report, Literature in the 21st Century:
Understanding Models of Support for Literary Fiction, In case you missed it,
the report concluded that… literary fiction in the UK is officially in ‘Crisis’.
Actually, it never said the word ‘crisis’ in that context,
that was how the press represented it. What it really said was that ‘this was not an easy time for literary fiction’.
Art Council Report |
It calculated that print sales of
literary fiction in the UK are significantly below where they stood in the
noughties, and that there has not been a corresponding increase in literary
fiction ebook sales to offset this (as has been the case for the genre and
commercial fiction which currently predominate in ebook format).
Anyone who has been paying attention might know that last
year we started up Fairlight Books with the specific aim of publishing literary
fiction in the UK (crazy fools, I know!). We did it because we could see how
difficult it was becoming for writers of literary fiction to get an agent and to
get published. We felt that
self-publishing didn’t work as well for literary fiction as it did for genre writers
and that, ipso facto, the end result
of all this would be readers purchasing less literary fiction. So it was reassuring,
if a little unnerving, to see that belief quantifiably demonstrated in the Art’s
Council release.
The report suggests a number of reasons for why the above
has occurred, all good views and all definitely part of the puzzle. My personal
view (and I’m very open to arguments against this or to hear how things stand
in comparison in other countries)… is that literary fiction faced a perfect
storm over the last ten to fifteen years in the UK – arising from the
phenomenal success of Fifty Shades, the phenomenal success of Gone Girl, and
the phenomenal success of the near-constant innovator, Amazon, in promoting
series and genre fiction.
As agents and commissioning editors became fixated on
finding the next Fifty Shades / Gone Girl or in finding books with which to
feed Amazon’s genre/series-loving algorithms, literary fiction took a back
seat. But is this just a blip? Or have UK
readers permanently ‘dumbed down’ so that they can no longer on average / on
mass / in the median cope with complicated fiction?
I guess starting up Fairlight Books had to that come from a
belief that the problem wasn’t that there was no longer a market for readers
who want to read ‘literary’ fiction, but that there was a market failure that
was making it less accessible to them (ie see the perfect storm theory above).
One of the interesting things that came from the report was
the debate it started on social media about what ‘literary’ fiction actually
is, whether there is a need for it, whether it should be subsidized and whether
people actually want to read it anymore.
One commentator asked ‘Why should we subsidise writers who have lost the plot?’ and quoted Eimear McBride’s A Girl is a Half-formed Thing as an example of writing that had ‘lost the plot’.
Personally, I think that’s a little unfair as it belies the
sweep of what ‘literary fiction’ entails and because there will always be (and
should always be) occasional novels which challenge boundaries in terms of
content and prose style and move literature forward.
But for every award winning, experimental, literary fiction novel
in existence, there are many beautifully crafted, readable, well-researched literary
works which are huge sellers. Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall and Bringing up the
Bodies being obvious examples.
These books show that there is still a market for literary
fiction out there – but that we need to support the UK’s writers of literary
fiction so that they don’t give up their craft and turn their creative energies
elsewhere, and we need to make sure that literary fiction is accessible to
readers.
Comments
I know this is a horrible generalisation, and I'm probably in a minority of one. But my problem with most literary fiction is that it ain't as good as it thinks it is. I had that Marcel Proust in the back of my cab once...I wish it had been Caroline. (Now there's an obscure literary reference for you. She's the actor who play Laure in Engrenages. Show off!)
Louise, I agree very much with your central point. May Fairlight prosper and do great things!
It does puzzle me. Like Jan, I love Mantel's novels - but I would call Wolf Hall 'historical fiction' and therefore 'genre.' It's an exceptionally good historical novel but still an 'historical.' (Same could be said about her brilliant 'Place of Greater Safety.') So at what point does a genre novel become 'literature'?
I love Kate Atkinson too and have read most, I think, of her Jackson Brodie books. They're 'detectives' and therefore genre -- but exceptionally good genre. (Love their titles: When Will There Be Good News? -- Started Early, Took The Dog.)
I also loved her 'Life After Life' which has a strong plot. It's handled in an original, twisty way -- but does having a plot make it Genre? Another 'historical' perhaps?
I didn't read Mantel or Atkinson because they were 'literature.' I read them because I liked what I heard about them: tried them (Amazon samples!), loved them, got stuck in.
And then, Dickens... I've read hardly any Dickens. My brother has galloped through most of them and loves them, but certainly wouldn't call himself a reader of 'literature.' (Most of the rest of his reading is Science Fiction. Genre,though often of high originality and quality). When Dickens was alive, he was 'popular.' Only now do we call him 'great literature.
Sorry to go on -- and I really do wish you luck with Fairlight Books -- but as you can see this whole matter of distinguishing between 'genre' and 'literary' novels puzzles me greatly.
So, from our list's point of view, a book could be literary and still be genre, so long as it hits the above. I guess Hilary Mantel is a great example of this as her writing ticks all the boxes above and yet is most definitely within the historical genre category. Same with Vonnegut for science fiction, I’d argue. And both have the added bonus of being genuinely readable and enjoyable.
But I’m sure if I’ve got that wrong from an academic point of view, Dennis will correct me, as he taught me pretty much everything I know!
Thank you all for the wishes of good luck with Fairlight – and Griselda, I’m happy (perversely!) to hear that your reading group struggles to find well written fiction with realistic gripping plots because that’s exactly the sort of fiction we’re going to be publishing in June and July of this year. A friend of mine once said he only reads dead people for exactly that reason, and I was determined to find some fiction to publish and tempt him back to the land of the living! So please do add The Prince of Mirrors by Alan Robert Clark to your reading list for June – I guarantee your book group won’t be disappointed, and I’ll be back with more details of our July releases as soon as I can as they also sound just the ticket.
I had an odd experience with Dickens. Couldn't deal with him at all when I was much younger, although I loved the films and dramas based on his books. Then I was given a Kindle, and for some reason I've forgotten, the first book I put on it was Great Expectations. I absolutely lapped it up, loved it. Strange.
I was a book seller for many years and have long suspected the demise of literary and/or main stream fiction has more to do with the death of bricks and mortar book shops and libraries than in any genuine change in reading tastes.
Online book selling, however complex the search engines, does not allow for browsing in the same way that perusing real shelves will.
I wish you all luck with the imprint!
And I agree completely with what you are saying Umberto and Jan - its the physical book stores that support great writing because if they love a book they will recommend it and hand sell it.
And Andrew - I'm glad you enjoyed Senyor Rodriguez, please do try The Prince of Mirrors when it comes out in June. I'd say this one definitely falls into the literary bucket (the prose is poetic without being overly flowery and the subject matter fantastically well researched) but its definitely also a very enjoyable read, so we are hoping it will do well.