On Behalf of My Client - Andrew Crofts
“She said what?” my wife’s tone of
voice managed to convey both her contempt for the woman I was describing and
her astonishment at my naiveté for swallowing her line. Her fork had come to a
halt half way to her mouth as she peered down the table at me, obviously awaiting
some sort of satisfactory response.
As so often happens I had been
talking without fully engaging my brain, expounding my client’s theories on why
she was performing a social service by sleeping with other people’s husbands.
My wife’s tone had woken me fully and I sensed danger. I paused and struggled to
replay whatever I had just said in my head. The words, which just an hour or
two before I had been typing out with fluent conviction, suddenly had a rather
hollow ring to them.
I cleared my throat and tried
putting my client’s point of view a little differently. My wife listened like a
High Court judge might listen to a lawyer pleading for a client with a hopeless
case, but her expression did not lighten.
“And you believed her?” she asked
once I had burbled to a standstill.
Now I was on the ropes. I had to
think why it was I was putting forward this woman’s highly immoral ideas as if
they were founded in logic. Under this sort of cross-examination my client’s
view of the world did seem a little ethically shaky, but as her ghost it was my
job to put her case for her as eloquently and convincingly as possible, not
challenge it. If I had actually questioned what she was telling me to her face
she would have grown defensive and would have become more cautious in talking
to me honestly. I needed her to open up and explain herself as fully as
possible, I did not want to intimidate her into silence or aggressive self
justification.
Under my wife’s inquisitorial
glare, however, I could feel my confidence in my client’s story ebbing away. I
was still only in the early stages of the writing and I couldn’t afford to lose
sympathy with the woman whose voice I was going to be thinking and speaking in
for the next few months.
“I can’t talk about it,” I said,
able to hear the panic in my own voice.
“What do you mean?”
“I have to believe in her version
of the story if I am going to be able to tell it convincingly. Once I’ve
finished the book we can argue about the rights and wrongs of her philosophy of
life as much as we like. I just can’t do it now.”
My wife gave a snort which could
have been simply agreement but to my sensitive ears still seemed to contain a
suggestion of derision. A new golden rule had just been born in our house.
Comments
But it's a little like a fiction writer 'channelling' some morality-free character. Or, say an upstanding Roman citizen who enjoys relaxing at the Games - or a 19th Century parent taking their child on a fun day out to the executions. You have to try and put their viewpoint fairly, however much ou disagree with it.