Starry, Starry Night by Bill Kirton
I
was intending to write about one thing when a second occurred to give the first
a different perspective. That’s the sort of thing that’s behind many of my
short stories and plays. I keep a cutting from a newspaper or a note I’ve made
and it just sits there waiting. Then along comes something else which completes
it or contradicts it or energises it in some way or another and I write about
it. That’s less so the case with novels because they develop in such a
leisurely way that what may begin as two incidents soon multiplies into
several.
Anyway,
for some reason, I was remembering visiting my daughter and her two sons in
Glasgow when they were little more than babies. Every night she used to read
them a story and, when they were in bed, sing them a song. I’m not sure how
often she’d change the song but the times I heard it it was ‘Starry, starry
night’, or whatever the correct title is. She had a sweet voice, was pitch perfect
and it sounded lovely drifting through from the boys’ room. So the two of them were
lying there in the dark hearing this just before they went to sleep and I
projected into the future and imagined them as grown men, middle aged even, and
how suddenly hearing the song broadcast on whatever the medium would be then
might affect them. The potential for drama, poignancy, joy, sorrow is enormous.
And
I think that’s the way the writing imagination works. Set up a scenario – a man
has just had a huge violent row with his wife, or he’s heard the news that
he’ll be the next CEO of a major international company, or the doctor calls him
in for the results of his tests, or he’s standing in the empty rooms of the
house he’s just sold before emigrating to New Zealand, or his wife’s left him –
and so on and so on. And, at one of these extremes, he hears the song, or
another song that triggers the memory of his mother’s voice.
I
know it’s not an original thought. Noel Coward, after all, wrote ‘Extraordinary
how potent cheap music is’ (which, by the way, isn’t as well expressed as it
might be; ending the quip with ‘is’ weakens it significantly – the sentence
should climax with ‘cheap music’). There were also those powerful plays and
films by Dennis Potter which made fantastic use of many old standards. But in
this case, it was the juxtaposition of a moment of exquisite security and
loving with perhaps some future turmoil that set me thinking about how the
narratives of our lives are far more subtle and textured than many of the
fictions we find so entertaining.
And
it was while I was wondering whether to make a blog of all that that we had an orange abomination of a visitor whose every utterance and action calls into question the sapiens bit of who we're supposed to be. But, before we allow our smugness to delude us too gravely, let's consider some of our own equally troubling idiosyncrasies. Take, for example, the
absurd charade of the Queen’s Speech. For those of you unfamiliar with the
rituals, here’s a brief summary.
Queen
arrives, puts on special robes and imperial crown, goes into the Lords and says
‘My Lords, pray be seated". Then she nods at the Lord Great Chamberlain to
fetch the House of Commons. The LGC lifts his wand (seriously, his wand) to
signal to Black Rod (don’t ask) to go and get them. Off he trots (with a police
inspector who says "Hats off, Strangers!" to everyone they pass en
route). As he gets near to the doors to the Chamber of the Commons, they’re slammed
in his face. He has to knock three times with his staff (the Black Rod), and then
they let him in.
OK,
that’s enough. I can’t go on. At least the MPs are wearing normal clothes.
Everyone else is in breeches, gold stuff, silly hats. It’s embarrassing. And as
I was thinking about all these (apparently) important people doing very silly
things, the contrast with the intensity and reality of 'normal' personal experiences
struck me very forcibly. I know that many fellow citizens as well as non-UK
residents take pride in or envy us the traditions and so on but how absurd that
people who (are failing to) take huge, serious decisions about health,
education, crime, poverty and all the rest, and are even responsible for (theoretically
at least) concocting the legislation needed to save the actual planet, have to
take part in a pantomime.
Most of our regular, repetitive daily events are light years away from the apparent 'realities' that preoccupy our lords and masters (and a tiny sprinkling of ladies). And that simple, beautiful ‘Starry, Starry Night’ drifting through the darkness is in a different realm of
truth from their pomp, circumstance and ermine robes. Where the hell are our priorities nowadays?
Comments
Did you see where the orange dotard greeted the Irish PM with the words: "“I think [the hard border] will all work out very well, and also for you with your wall, your border. I mean, we have a border situation in the United States, and you have one over here. But I hear it’s going to work out very well here.”
Katherine, I find that my particular musical 'triggers' recall (mostly fondly) specific individuals.
Susan, I think someone should write an 'appreciation' of that oaf's special way with language. Our intelligence relationship with the USA is, for example 'incredible' (not very reassuring), his use of the word 'climate' defies analysis, and his narrow range of superlatives brings together totally incompatible nouns and adjectives. English, like everything else, is not safe with him.
xo
eden
And thanks,too, Eden, for the kind words, but I've only managed one music blog, you produce them every Monday.
Perhaps I should add, though, a postscript to tell you that the same daughter was visiting Aberdeen yesterday evening for a friend's daughter's wedding today and she and I had a wonderful evening at a restaurant during which she drank even more wine than I did and yet we both remained more than relatively coherent (and there was no singing).
The memory you describe, Umberto, was magical. It must have been a privilege to experience it - every time.
And there's no need for you to apologise for that abysmal fraud and his visit. We have many American friends (including yourself, of course) and I know that not one of them is responsible for his elevation and that your suffering at his (tiny) hands is far greater than ours.