Did what you read as a child influence your attitude towards animals in later life? by Elizabeth Kay
The first
book that I couldn’t put down was about an underwater world, and I think it was
called Claud the Sea Horse, although
a discussion board on Amazon suggests it might have been called The Deep Sea Horse. Anyhow, was it that
which engendered a love of snorkelling, and
exploring a world so very different
from the one on dry land? I still think the most beautiful things I have ever
seen were two huge shoals of little fish in Indonesia – one electric blue, the
other iridescent green, and the cuttlefish that changed colour as it moved from
rock to seaweed to rock beneath me – and then swam up behind me to get a better
look.
Christine
Pullein-Thompson and Ruby Ferguson fuelled a love of ponies, and Black Beauty showed me things from a
horse’s viewpoint. I think children find it far easier to see things from an
animal’s point of view than adults, as their perceptions are not so fixed. Elyne
Mitchell’s Silver Brumby books made me look at the difference between being
wild and being domesticated, and what a horse might think about it. I don’t now
keep pets – I have a pond for the frogs and newts, and a garden full of nest
boxes and bird feeders, as well as an insect hotel for solitary bees, lacewings
and ladybirds. I love the idea of creatures that visit because they want to,
and are free to live their lives as close as possible to the way their ancestors
did.
I moved
from the children’s books of the fifties to a more non-fiction approach, via
Gerald Durrell to Konrad Lorenz and Desmond Morris. One of the joys of later
life has been the chance to travel, and see the places and creatures in Durrell’s
books for myself, in their natural habitat. I don’t regard any animal as ugly
or distasteful – all you have to do is to see the world from their angle, and
it all makes sense. I do find the cruelty of the natural world difficult to
take on occasion, and with our increasing knowledge of the intelligence of some
animals it’s hard to maintain a view that they don’t know what they’re doing.
But as a species we’re no better, and frequently a lot worse.
I haven’t
actually written anything from an animal’s perspective, although I have written
about animals and hopefully tried to convey my own views at the same time. Hunted was about ivory poaching, and
stemmed from an article I read about a rogue elephant that was defending a
wildlife corridor so that its friends and relatives could travel from one
feeding ground to another. If he had been human, we’d have seen him as a freedom
fighter. The Tree Devil was about genetic engineering, and was a plug for octopuses
which are far brighter and more emotional than most people realise when they’re
eating them. And no, I’m not vegetarian, although I do try to make sure I eat
responsibly farmed animal products. After all, we do have four canine teeth, so
it shouldn’t be a large part of our diet as all our other teeth are there to
deal with fruit and veg and grains.
I have
created a number of mythical creatures in the Divide Trilogy, and, as all mythical animals are re-combinations of
existing fauna I’ve considered the characteristics of the source material.
Consequently, the griffins have the magnified vision of vultures, and the sinistroms
(devil-hyenas) have some of the more unpleasant traits of the creatures that
inspired them. The shreddermouths (crocodile-type beings) also behave true to
type. Strong mother-love, combined with an urge to store dead bodies until they
begin to decompose…
The politically correct brigade
will have outlawed one of my favourite books as a child, which portrayed a
gypsy called Zachary Boswell who introduced a little girl to badgers and
hedgehogs and deer, as well as many other creatures. I do think that my early
reading had a profound influence on my attitudes as an adult, and that as writers
we have a duty to try and create a love of the natural world in our younger readers,
without being sentimental, as it’s to
their advantage in the long run. And their children’s children.
Comments