Homophonia - by Debbie Bennett
Here’s a
thing – a spellcheck is not a dictionary. It can tell you if the word you have
written is correctly spelled, but what if that wasn’t the word you wanted in
the first place? What good is a perfect word in the wrong surroundings?
Writers
rely far too much on spellcheck in my opinion. There are the obvious too/two/to and their/there/they’re mix-ups. Its/it’s
and your/you’re. Spellcheck is
never going to tell you you’ve used the wrong one and it’s an easy mistake to
make when your fingers are hitting the keyboard in an inspirational frenzy. But that’s
when editing becomes important, when sometimes just changing the font or the type
size moves the text around on the screen and you stop seeing what you think is there and start reading the
actual words you wrote.
I read the
sample of an ebook on Amazon a while back. I can’t remember what it was, but I
didn’t get past the first paragraph because of the hoards of people. Yes –
hoards of people – can you imagine them all stuffed away in cupboards and
spilling out at every opportunity? How very messy. Obviously the writer meant hordes of people, ran a spellcheck (or
not) and thought there was no problem. Now I’m typing this in Word and already hoards is double-underlined in blue.
Word frequently doesn’t get my writing – and I often ignore its little hints,
but I always look. Because maybe, it just might be right once in a while …
I’ve just
read another book. This one has our heroine studying her hero and contemplating
his taught muscles. Clearly, the hero
has been giving his body lessons in deportment, but I’m pretty sure the writer
meant taut muscles. Or else I missed
the point of the scene completely.
A character
reigning in their emotions, or
passions, or whatever is another classic homophone I see regularly, as if royalty
have the prerogative in self-restraint. I’ve lost track of the number of
characters who ask their friends to bare
with them, and I eagerly await their imminent nudity, but it never happens.
And I’m
sorry, but words are a writer’s tools – and if you can’t master them, you have
lost my custom. If my plumber has the wrong size spanner, I’m not going to pay
him to do the job just because he has a nice sign-written van and smart
overalls. And if a writer can’t use words correctly, then why bother at all?
Here’s a list of common homophones. My person pet hates are numbers 84 and 97 – and of course, the classic misunderstandings of the words elicit/illicit and affect/effect, which the purists might say aren’t true homophones anyway, since there are subtle differences in pronunciation. But I’m a pedant so I'll stick to the rules, thank you.
And finally, here’s a classic: An advert I saw today for a 4-birth caravan! An extension to the maternity wing, perhaps?
And finally, here’s a classic: An advert I saw today for a 4-birth caravan! An extension to the maternity wing, perhaps?
Comments
Yes, Word's auto-correct has a lot to answer for! That list is useful. I'm bookmarking it for my RLF post.
As for the 4-birth caravan... maybe the start of a new round of NHS budget cuts?