What goes around comes around... who will remember YOU in 100 years? by Cally Phillips
120 years ago a new writer ‘burst onto the literary scene.
He had, of course, spent the obligatory 10+ years honing his craft before his ‘overnight’
success.
Birthplace |
It was 1894. The height of the Victorian era and the cult of celebrity
was very similar to what it is today. The only difference was the means of
dissemination. Instead of ‘social’ media, the popular media of 1894 was the
periodical (if you were middle /upper class) and the monthly, weekly or ‘penny
dreadful’ magazines (if you were middle/lower
class). The distinction between ‘literature’ and ‘fiction’ was still being
thrashed out (in said periodicals and magazines) and genre fiction was pretty
much still an ‘out there’ concept. Our man fell foul of this many a time and
oft. Especially with his ‘historical
fiction’ writing.
There was a split between those of the ‘old’ order who still
believed that literature was essentially the province of the ‘educated’ and
those of the ‘new’ order who believed that it was the ‘right’ of the
masses. These two orders fought it out
like Coke and Pepsi, or Google and Microsoft, in the publishing arena. The ‘traditional’ literary magazines still
held onto the belief that writing was for gentlemen (and scorned at the paying
of such) while the emerging mass market popular magazines started paying people
to write and review (and paying handsomely). A battleground was formed around the persona of the reviewer/critic. Throw in religious and political
alliances and it was a milieu which could make or break men (mostly men but
some women) and their talent.
A.P.Watt |
R.L.Stevenson |
In 1893 ‘our’ man had a ‘collection’ of his magazine short
stories published by Unwin. ‘Our’ man dedicated it to R.L. Stevenson (one of the
‘greats’ of his day) with whom he’d been corresponding for some years (a mentor
if you will) and sent him a copy. Stevenson said nice things about and wrote a
poem which went into the second (and subsequent editions). Because yes, it was
popular enough to go into several editions pretty swiftly and they did well
enough that Unwin decided to take quite a punt on him – to make him a ‘star.’
Don’t be fooled into thinking that marketing is a 21st
century skill. In the 1890’s they knew what to do and how to do it. Unwin
backed himself by bringing out no less than 4 works by our man in the same
year. Two of these were what might best
be described today as long short stories or short novellas. They had been
previously serialised in several episodes and come in at about 20,000 words
each. ‘Mad Sir Uchtred of the Hills’ caused an absolute stooshie and ‘The Great
Preacher’ had its name changed to the more media savvy ‘The Play Actress.’
Unwin was not one for the slow burn. He knew how to make the most of his investment
and he knew that he needed to make an impact and he brought out 2 full length
novels in the same year. (All ‘new’ writers will do well to note that
it’s good to have a 10 year backlog of work to draw from when they decide to
make you famous overnight!)
2 for 1 'then' |
And for a digital present |
If you have heard of our man, it is likely that you’ll have
read one of the two novels just mentioned. This is not because they are the ‘best’
but because they were the ones that received the most publicity time over the
years. As the ‘breakthrough’ novels they
are the ones people come back to time and again as ‘paradigms’ of the work. But
this is ridiculous. Our man published
over 60 novels in his career and these two stand out no more than any of the
others. There is much more to our man
than these two novels, believe me. (Question for the writers among us – how would
you like to be judged only on your earliest published works?)
You know you're a celeb when Vanity Fair Cartoons you. |
It was an age of syndication and wide market
penetration. Of course with fierce competiton,
‘sides’ emerged and celebrities were subject not just to hyperbolic praise, as
they were ‘puffed’ to eye watering sales figures; equally they were slated in
other corners. Our man had his fair share of both. He was accused of plagiarism,
of writing too fast, of writing too much, of writing too shockingly, of writing
not shockingly enough. You name it, they threw it at him. Par for the course. And the controversy just fuelled the
sales. Contemporary cultural interest was vested as much in an
author’s personality as it was in his books. In some quarters there was little
discussion of writers’ books, but plenty of background information about their
lives, ways and habits. A contemporary ‘critic’ stated ‘The curiosity with which a section of the newspaper press has been inspired
as to Mr. Crockett’s personal whereabouts, as to his comings and goings, his
engagements for the future, and his prices ‘per thousand words’, would have
seemed to indicate that in him we had discovered a person of considerably more
than the average height.’
Because yes, the cat’s out the bag - our ‘celebrity, best-selling writer’ is
none other than S.R.Crockett (pause while you say – who?) Born plain Samuel Crocket on 24th September 1859 and died famous Samuel Rutherford Crockett on 16th April 1914
(the sharp witted amongst you will now begin to work out what’s behind this
post).
You may never have heard of him but the statistical tables
of best-sellers record that over the years 1891-1901 it was the works of
Crockett that made the lists more often than any other author, including Marie
Corelli, (again – who?) who is generally
identified as the best-selling of all Victorian and Edwardian novelists. Maclaren
(thrice times who?) takes fourth place
in this survey with Kipling third and Barrie ninth. (you've heard of at least one of them, right?) So – our man was
among the best-selling authors of his
day. And they sold plenty in those days.
‘The Lilac Sunbonnet’ (1894) sold out all 100,000 copies on the day of
publication. Crockett’s early work went
into edition after edition after edition.
It didn’t flood the market – there was a huge market after all – but it
rode the crest of the wave for quite some time.
'The Windsor' Magazine of 1896 reported In three years the aggregate sale of Mr Crockett’s books has reached a quarter of a million copies. and added that In America his books have had a very large sale, not always to the monetary advantage of their author, owing to the pirated editions which have been published
In 1895 Crockett gave up his day job to become a full time writer, well able to support his growing family by the pen (or typewriter). He embarked upon a career which he tailored to the requirements of the publishers of ‘popular’ fiction of the day. He wrote for serial fiction (often reluctantly) and developed an episodic style which made for fast paced, exciting stories. He turned out on average 2 novels a year, one set in Scotland and one set abroad. He was versatile and yet developed a unique style even while remaining in the ‘popular’ camp. As a writer he can hold his head up beside Dickens, Hardy, Dumas and Stevenson without a qualm. He wrote historical fiction, adventure romance and contemporary social stories. He dealt with rural childhood as easily as urban poverty.
In 1895 Crockett gave up his day job to become a full time writer, well able to support his growing family by the pen (or typewriter). He embarked upon a career which he tailored to the requirements of the publishers of ‘popular’ fiction of the day. He wrote for serial fiction (often reluctantly) and developed an episodic style which made for fast paced, exciting stories. He turned out on average 2 novels a year, one set in Scotland and one set abroad. He was versatile and yet developed a unique style even while remaining in the ‘popular’ camp. As a writer he can hold his head up beside Dickens, Hardy, Dumas and Stevenson without a qualm. He wrote historical fiction, adventure romance and contemporary social stories. He dealt with rural childhood as easily as urban poverty.
So why haven’t you heard of him or read any of his work? I call it the Spangles effect. You can’t buy something that is no longer ‘produced.’ You can’t read something that you’ve never heard of. And unless you have a hankering for Spangles you’ll never know what you are missing now that they are no longer on sale. But if you grew up loving Spangles I’m willing to bet you’d buy them again today if you could. And enjoy them. If you loved Spangles I bet you are right now craving the taste of a butterscotch one. If not, please substitute the long gone sweet confection of your choice for Spangles to get the point.
'The' sweet of choice 1940's -1970's. |
Well, I can’t bring back Spangles, but I have worked for the
last two years to bring you the equivalent in fiction. I’ve been engaged in a two year (or twenty
year depending on how you look at it) one woman mission to bring a fine writer
back into public consciousness. I’m no
T.Fisher Unwin, no W. Robertson Nicoll and I don’t have the backing of either
the mass media or the literary elite, so I have no expectations (Great or
otherwise) and know this endeavour is destined to remain a ‘niche’ experience
but I feel a sense of personal pride that I have shown an innovative approach
to the ‘digital revolution’ and am now able
to offer readers both a choice and an ‘informed’ choice about their reading
matter. My job’s nearly done. The rest
is up to you. I hope that you’ll feel
inspired to support a fellow writer. Broaden your reading horizons, take a
chance and see what you can find outside of today’s homogenised
mainstream. After all, in another 100
years we’ll all be long forgotten. Suck your Spangles while you can.
I'm guessing none of us will have a memorial this lasting. But having your books read is a better memorial isn't it? |
If you want to find out more about S.R.Crockett, The Galloway Raiders (an S.R.Crockett
literary society) has been set up and is running a series of events from
April 12th –April 18th. It’s free to join and you get
discounts on ebooks. Why not Check
it out here
And, heaven forfend, if you are actually brave enough to
step outside of the familiar and read
some of his work, go to Ayton Publishing
Crockett’s Galloway based novels are now available in a 32 volume collection‘The Galloway Collection’ is in both ebook and POD formats. The Collection is ‘launching’ at Wigtown Book Town on April 16th to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the death of S.R.Crockett - a friend I have never met, but a friend none the less.
Why not make him one of 'your' virtual friends? He's even on facebook.
Crockett’s Galloway based novels are now available in a 32 volume collection‘The Galloway Collection’ is in both ebook and POD formats. The Collection is ‘launching’ at Wigtown Book Town on April 16th to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the death of S.R.Crockett - a friend I have never met, but a friend none the less.
Why not make him one of 'your' virtual friends? He's even on facebook.
And if you are really more interested in sweeties than
reading check
this Guardian article out – Spangles
hail from 1948 – the year Orwell published 1984 – and are the no 1 retro sweet
listed!
HOT BREAKING NEWS!
The following is listed in the Scottish Parliament Business Bulletein today.
HOT BREAKING NEWS!
The following is listed in the Scottish Parliament Business Bulletein today.
Alex Fergusson: Centenary of S R Crockett, Scottish
Novelist—
That the Parliament notes the centenary of the death of
Samuel Rutherford Crockett, the Scottish novelist, on 16 April 2014; further notes that
he was born and raised in Galloway, graduated from the University of Edinburgh in 1879
and, after some years of travelling, became a minister at Penicuik in 1886 before
becoming a full-time novelist following the success of his first novel, The
Stickit Minister, in 1893 and subsequent novels, which featured the history of both
Scotland and Galloway; commends the Galloway Raiders on marking Crockett’s
centenary with a series of events including walks, talks, readings and the launch of
the 32-volume, The Galloway Collection, which will bring all of Crockett’s
Galloway-based novels back into circulation for the 21st century in e-book and print
editions, and considers this to be a most fitting way to commemorate the centenary of the
death of S R Crockett, considered one of Scotland’s greatest writers.
Not sure exactly what it means but it's nice to be recognised, and it feels like quite an endorsement. Happy days.
Comments
Cally, I think what you've done/are doing for SRC is wonderful. He must be a very happy and grateful man, even from beyond the grave.
Like Dennis, I think all your hard work is wonderful Cally, but I'm sad if it takes time from your own writing.