Formal? Casual?Affectionate? Ali Bacon reminds us not everyone wants to be kissed
Now we’re home from holiday, I’ve stopped worrying about my
lack of Spanish, but the niceties of how we use our own language are sometimes
just as mysterious as a foreign tongue. Maybe it’s a preoccupation of the elderly, but I’m always
aware of the register we use depending on our audience. At the extreme ends of
the scale, an application for a job or a pitch to a publisher is always more
formal than a thank you note or reply to an invitation, unless we are making a
conscious effort to be matey. Informality, after all, is a characteristic of
speech rather than writing, or should that be ‘was’?
Still nice to get some things in writing |
The universal use of email (and all communication
via keyboard) has gradually blurred the
lines. It was once the case that a stranger contacting me at work would start
with ‘Good morning’ or ‘Dear’. These days I might use ‘Dear’ for a first
cautious approach but anything after that would be ‘hello’, gradually giving
way to ‘hi’. And this includes people I have never met in the real world. Virtual
meetings are so much the norm we feel we have met people even if we’ve never
sat down for a cup of coffee together.
We also meet in all kinds of online spaces with their own
unwritten rules of communication. I made contact last year via Facebook
Messenger with The St Andrews Photography Festival , or at least its publicity
department. We were perfectly polite, but our exchange of messages (in my case hunched
over a hot laptop around midnight) was peppered with things like ‘no worries’
and ‘brill.’ And this was potentially the start of a business arrangement! We
could have been more formal if we had wanted to, but really we were two
people talking, so there was no need.
There is a final layer to this new world of interaction. Social media and email platforms have strong visual signals . Not
only that, but these display differently
on different devices. I’ve just begun to realise the way I react and respond to
messages is affected by the thing I am holding in my hand or looking at on my
desk. Say, for instance I get an email about an event where I’m reading my work
with other authors. I may or may not have met the organiser but we’ve already
been in touch by email. If I answer this
on my laptop (which rarely travels anywhere so really it’s my permanent
workplace) I’d probably say.
Hello xxx,
Many thanks for the information, I’m really looking forward to (event name) and meeting the other readers. I’ll make sure I’m there in good time.
Many thanks for the information, I’m really looking forward to (event name) and meeting the other readers. I’ll make sure I’m there in good time.
Best wishes,
Ali B
But if I pick the same message up on my phone, out-and-about
in a shop, car-park or even in the golf club, I might just say.
Thanks for this. Sounds great. See you there. Ali x.
The different interface and visual display, and I suppose my
state of mind, actually changes the
nature of the discourse. (Here's a survey of what devices we use the most.) And did you spot that sneaky x? I used to steer clear
of social kissing, but on the internet I’m an absolute luvvie. In certain
situations, not to put one in looks downright rude!
The constant conversation -in real time |
Does it actually matter if we slip into casual friendliness
with strangers as long as we get the arrangements right? Years ago I remember reading that any important email
should be save and reread next day before sending and this saved me from falling on my face more than once. But where once a gap of two or three days between message and
response would be fine, now we are all in a state of constant
conversation. Even so, if a message arrives that looks important, I often leave
it until I’m at my desk to compose my considered answer. At the same time, I’m
very well aware of a tranche of my acquaintances who do not
have desks, or laptops or PCs – and who don't need to differentiate
between emails, texts, Whatsappp messages etc. If any of these people seem too
casual, I make allowances!
Longing for a letter on nice headed paper? That could be a long
wait. And in most respects, our call-me-anytime- kiss-me-afterwards culture is
progress. Things can be arranged so quickly and so easily. And I can think of some
very good friendships forged on line.
But if casual is fine, sloppy is to be avoided, and sometimes that’s hard to
pull off. We’re always in a hurry, let’s face it, and the end of that email
just slipped off the bottom of the screen. Was it Thursday or Tuesday? Did it
even get in the calendar?
We have all had those communication disasters. Just remember
some conversations are more important than others.
And maybe not everyone wants to be
kissed!
Ali Bacon writes contemporary and historical fiction.
Her latest book,In the Blink of an Eye, just signed with Linen Press, is due out in 2018.
Her latest book,In the Blink of an Eye, just signed with Linen Press, is due out in 2018.
Comments
As a lecturer in French, I was always amazed and confounded by the compulsory flourishes they use to end letters, such as 'Veuillez accepter, Messieurs (or Monsieur or Madame), mes salutations distinguées', or 'Croyez, cher Monsieur (or chère Madame), à l'expression de mes sentiments les meilleurs' or 'Je vous prie d'agréer, Monsieur le Directeur, l'assurance de ma considération distinguée'. As for the recommended way of ending a letter to the Pope, as well as having to subject oneself to the most abject verbal self-effacement, it all has to be done 'Prosterné à [ses] pieds'.
Have to admit though, I hate emails beginning Hi if no name nor comma follows, that feels rude to me. If in the subject line it definitely sounds like spam. Better not to put anything, just start the message. Much prefer the formality and tradition of Dear. The French are another matter.
I don't mind being addressed with 'Hi' but I hate seeing 'Best' as a sign-off on emails. It just seems lazy to me.